Search for: "In Re Standing Order With Reasons Regarding Objections" Results 501 - 520 of 1,199
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Jun 2022, 8:25 am
In any event, the joining of the US delegation to the OEIGWG has (re-)fuelled long smouldering discussions about the prospects of success of the OEIGWG endeavour and the need to explore alternative avenues, such as opting for the treaty design of a framework agreement. [read post]
26 Dec 2013, 1:27 pm
It is for that reason, if for no other, that it is likely that courts, when faced with this issue, will tend to gravitate toward the more straightforward formalist approach. [read post]
7 Oct 2014, 7:38 am by Wells Bennett
There’s a transparency angle to this, too: in an unprecedented move last week, and over U.S. objections, U.S. [read post]
13 Nov 2018, 11:58 am by Anushka Limaye
Advises staff regarding policies, procedures, and directives of higher level management. [read post]
19 Nov 2018, 11:56 am by Anushka Limaye
Advises staff regarding policies, procedures, and directives of higher level management. [read post]
7 Apr 2022, 9:00 am by Phil Dixon
Notably, the reason does not have to be a reason that makes sense, but a reason that does not deny equal protection. [read post]
18 Jun 2008, 4:59 pm
However, this is not attributable to trial counsel's failure to object to instruction by the trial court, as a timely objection would not have been sustained. [read post]
23 Feb 2021, 9:19 am by Jacquelyn Greene
Often referred to in the literature as competency, that standard requires that: No person may be tried, convicted, sentenced, or punished for a crime when by reason of mental illness or defect he is unable to understand the nature and object of the proceedings against him, to comprehend his own situation in reference to the proceedings, or to assist in his defense in a rational or reasonable manner. [read post]
12 Nov 2017, 7:00 am by Dave Blair, Karen House
In order to successfully hunt a target, you must anticipate their actions; in order to anticipate their actions, you must empathize with them. [read post]
22 Sep 2011, 4:25 am by Dianne Saxe
Further details regarding this Indemnity are discussed below. [read post]
18 Dec 2018, 9:02 pm by Edward A. Fallone
Constitution at the time of its initial adoption should be regarded as authoritative for purposes of later constitutional interpretation. [read post]
1 Aug 2011, 8:23 am by Graeme Hall
Secretary of State for the Home Department v CD [2011] EWHC 2087 (Admin) (29 July 2011): Control order ruled lawful: “reasonable grounds for suspecting CD is a leading figure in network of Islamist extremists” – see guardian.co.uk SCHALK AND KOPF v. [read post]
1 Oct 2018, 7:12 am by Laurence Lai
Each independent claim would have to stand on its own in terms of novelty, inventive step and clarity as normal. [read post]
8 Jun 2016, 11:24 am by Susan Hennessey
In it Snowden asks a question regarding a chart presented during training on USSID 18 setting forth the orders of legal authorities. [read post]
4 Apr 2023, 5:16 am by Michael Geist
No democratic principle is more important than freedom of expression and Bill C-11 fails in this regard. [read post]
Regarding the City’s use of the CEQA exemptions, the court reasoned that petitioner’s argument that conditions of approval to address pedestrian safety and traffic disruption during construction were not “mitigation”; rather, they were added under the City’s CUP authority to require precautionary safety measures separate from the determination that the impacts would be less than significant and that petitioner presented no evidence to the City that… [read post]
16 Aug 2018, 10:59 am by Chibli Mallat
” While nuances may be in order, I consider confederation and federation to be the same.) [read post]