Search for: "In re S.E." Results 501 - 520 of 620
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Jul 2008, 7:26 pm
Prescriber's claim for economic harm from negative publicity about breast implants he implanted isnot sufficient injury in tort or warranty.In re Minnesota Breast Implant Litigation, 36 F. [read post]
5 Jul 2007, 2:50 pm
Unfortunately, a slowly growing number of courts have begun to re-write the law of unconscionability in a way that renders it meaningless. [read post]
17 Jun 2010, 5:00 am by Bexis
June 15, 2010).We’re particularly pleased with Gibson because it dispatched one of our longest-standing bête noirs – market share liability. [read post]
25 Feb 2021, 4:00 am by Administrator
Doughty, Documents Relating to the Constitutional History of Canada 1759–1791 (Ottawa: S.E. [read post]
10 Apr 2019, 7:50 am by Eugene Volokh
Louisiana, 379 U.S. 64, 67 (1964) (taking the same view as Herbert); In re Gronowicz, 764 F.2d 983, 988 & n.4 (3d Cir. 1985) (en banc) (likewise); Phelps v. [read post]
29 Aug 2013, 5:00 am by Bexis
Lester, 736 S.E.2d 699, 702-03 (Va. 2013) (noting sanctions of $542,000 against counsel, $180,000 against plaintiff, and an adverse-inference instruction, when counsel advised plaintiff to “clean up” his Facebook page, which included a photo of plaintiff drinking beer while wearing said t-shirt in the company of said presumably attractive mothers).Pharma manufacturers face an uneven playing field on e-discovery. [read post]
31 Oct 2011, 3:15 am by Steve Lombardi
In In re the Estate of Johnny Vajgrt, Bill Ernst, Inc., Intervenor (IA Sup. [read post]
30 Sep 2010, 2:29 pm by Bexis
Rep. 2 (May 2008) (asserting that $4.85 billion Vioxx settlement was for “nuisance” value"); In re Agent Orange Products Liability Litigation, 818 F.2d 145, 171 (2d Cir. 1987) (finding “good reason to view” $180 million Agent Orange settlement as for “nuisance value”). [read post]
5 Aug 2010, 8:28 am by Paul Bland
by Paul Bland, Claire Prestel, and Melanie Hirsch The consumer and civil rights communities are closely watching AT&T Mobility v. [read post]
30 May 2012, 4:29 am by Susan Brenner
App. 42, 669 S.E.2d 30 (North Carolina Court of Appeals 2008) (even where portions of a statement are inaudible or inadvertently destroyed, the rule of completeness has not been interpreted to U.S. v. [read post]
20 Jul 2010, 9:02 am by PaulKostro
., In re K.W., 666 S.E.2d 490, 494 (2008) (although victim admitted that the proffered MySpace page was hers, she claimed that her friend posted the answers to the survey questions that defendant sought to introduce as impeachment evidence with respect to her claims of rape). [read post]
17 Mar 2010, 12:09 am by Orin Kerr
Carter, 682 S.E.2d 416 (N.C.App. 2009); Hathaway v. [read post]