Search for: "In the Interest of Cp"
Results 501 - 520
of 908
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Jul 2012, 5:58 am
“Statement from Alison Levitt QC, Principal Legal Advisor to the Director of Public Prosecutions (DPP): This statement is made in the interests of transparency and accountability to explain the decisions reached in relation to Operation Weeting.” Full press release Crown Prosecution Service, 24th July 2012 Source: www.cps.gov.uk [read post]
19 Jul 2012, 5:56 pm
It also gave rise to interesting questions of defamation law. [read post]
17 Jul 2012, 8:41 am
And victim here a minor, so even stronger interest. [read post]
17 Jul 2012, 5:05 am
Officers had the defendant's name but intentionally concealed it from the magistrate because it was the location they were interested in searching.Further, because the officers could have detained the defendant outside his home until a new warrant could be obtained but did not do so, the court ordered suppression of the evidence. [read post]
12 Jul 2012, 4:57 pm
Consultation Paper 180 ASIC’s power to wind up abandoned companies (CP 180) outlines how ASIC intends to exercise this new power, and how it will prioritise matters for winding up ASIC is proposing to apply a public interest test when deciding whether to wind up a company. [read post]
10 Jul 2012, 4:01 am
In CPD, NSW has 10 hours (cp E+W 16). [read post]
8 Jul 2012, 1:51 pm
An interesting read. [read post]
7 Jul 2012, 4:37 am
Licata, 761 F.2d 537, 541 (9th Cir. 1985) ("A seizure of a closed container affects only the owner's possessory interests and not the privacy interests vested in the contents. [read post]
6 Jul 2012, 8:55 am
” CP (41037-1-II) at 10. [read post]
25 Jun 2012, 7:08 am
Brewer, CP is a paralegal with Hall Estill, one of the larger firms in Oklahoma. [read post]
18 Jun 2012, 2:00 am
Interested? [read post]
16 Jun 2012, 11:48 am
We have no privilege with our children, CPS can interfere in that relationship in the name of protecting the child and the family courts do not consider the needs of parents at all but only what the court decides is in the best interest of the child. 3. [read post]
14 Jun 2012, 4:30 pm
CP Productions, Inc. v. [read post]
10 Jun 2012, 11:30 pm
Very interesting to hear the viewpoint of a former government lawyer. [read post]
5 Jun 2012, 3:43 pm
” Accordingly, even if CPS finds safety concerns it may still determine that it is safe to leave an at-risk child or his or her siblings in the home. [read post]
5 Jun 2012, 12:00 pm
The Sixth released an interesting published decision today in United States v. [read post]
1 Jun 2012, 8:15 am
But I do not accept that that public interest is served by encouraging the police to issue statements indicating their opinion that the decision of the CPS not to pursue a prosecution (or, for that matter, the decision of a judge that a defendant has no case to answer) is wrong because the individual concerned is or is probably guilty. [read post]
1 Jun 2012, 5:40 am
With the recent election of seven nominees to the board of CP Rail, Bill Ackman and Pershing Square demonstrated in dramatic fashion that no Canadian company is immune from the rough-and-tumble world of proxy battles. [read post]
30 May 2012, 5:00 am
Even though the CPS found in favour of Hill and the Guardian on the public interest, the process took ten months and the reporter was under threat of prosecution and possible conviction all of that time. [read post]
29 May 2012, 3:51 am
However, the CPS had concluded that the public interest did not favour a prosecution. [read post]
