Search for: "In the Matter of: Graham"
Results 501 - 520
of 2,072
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Jun 2019, 10:10 am
In its 1983 decision in the matter of INS v. [read post]
14 Jun 2019, 8:27 am
Graham v. [read post]
13 Jun 2019, 5:25 am
And to some extent, Graham concedes as much. [read post]
10 Jun 2019, 7:30 am
As many have noted, our own era is not an age where the proclivity to compromise is applauded, and it remains to be seen if a Democratic Congress can figure out a way to "check and balance" a President who has exhibited exemplary skills in bringing his political party to heel and making such figures as Lindsay Graham or Mitch McConnell "useful idiots" for his aggrandizing views of presidential power. [read post]
9 Jun 2019, 7:26 am
While the Supreme Court stated in its 2010 decision, Graham v. [read post]
8 Jun 2019, 7:12 am
Why Elizabeth Warren Matters. [read post]
3 Jun 2019, 9:04 am
Whether judicial intervention would be helpful in such a moment is ultimately a prudential matter rather than something dictated by the Constitution itself. [read post]
26 May 2019, 2:13 pm
Mathilde Pavis reviews Public rights – Copyright’s Public Domains by Graham Greenleaf and David Lindsay. [read post]
20 May 2019, 10:01 am
appeared first on Law Offices of Graham D. [read post]
12 May 2019, 5:06 am
The questions posed are whether the White Paper demonstrates sufficient certainty and precision in respect of each of the following matters. [read post]
4 May 2019, 12:08 pm
Image from PopSugarI’ve had a front row seat to China for well over a decade. [read post]
4 May 2019, 11:50 am
Lindsey Graham and Rep. [read post]
3 May 2019, 8:15 am
Under Graham v. [read post]
29 Apr 2019, 4:14 pm
On 8 April 2019, spent the best part of a day reading the UK government’s Online Harms White Paper, I concluded that if the road to hell was paved with good intentions, this was a motorway. [read post]
28 Apr 2019, 12:28 pm
As a trusted and valued voice on appellate matters, we also regularly provide feedback on proposed revisions to legislation, court rules and practices at the state and federal level with the aim of promoting the fair and efficient working of our judicial system.I invite you to learn more about us. [read post]
25 Apr 2019, 9:07 am
The Committee will hold its first meeting on Monday, May 6, 2019, at the SEC’s headquarters in Washington, D.C.The Committee was established by the SEC Small Business Advocate Act of 2016, and is designed to provide a formal mechanism for the Commission to receive advice and recommendations on Commission rules, regulations and policy matters relating to small businesses, including smaller public companies. [read post]
23 Apr 2019, 6:45 am
” Should legislation move forward to eliminate the requirement for inventive application, we will have to learn if it in fact is a requirement of constitutional stature in granting authority to “inventors for their discoveries” (or is simply like the dicta in Graham v. [read post]
18 Apr 2019, 6:48 am
On March 22, 2019, Special Counsel Robert Mueller concluded his investigation of matters related to Russian attempts to interfere in the 2016 presidential election and submitted his confidential report to me pursuant to Department of Justice regulations. [read post]
17 Apr 2019, 6:11 am
In his letter to judiciary committee chairmen Jerrold Nadler (D-N.Y.) and Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) dated March 29, Attorney General William Barr indicated that there were four categories of material he is redacting in the version that is expected to be made available to Congress: (1) material subject to Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 6(e) that cannot be made public; (2) classified information that implicates the sources and methods of the intelligence community; (3) information that is… [read post]
8 Apr 2019, 7:12 am
” Whether state legislative appointment was included in the Constitution to protect state governments, though, is a matter of some dispute. [read post]
