Search for: "In the Matter of the Civil Commitment of: T. L. S."
Results 501 - 520
of 772
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Jun 2014, 2:00 pm
Federal Communications Commission’s outdated rationale for diminishing the First Amendment protection of broadcasters; (2) whether, in light of the Court’s decision in Citizens United v. [read post]
25 Jun 2014, 11:13 am
Professor Jeff Kahn (SMU Law, also visiting at W&L Law) writes in with the following guest post on yesterday’s no-fly list decision. [read post]
4 Jun 2014, 6:36 am
In effect this is a duty of proactive disclosure outside of Section 4(1) of the RTI Act and its compliance is not dependent upon a stimulation received from any citizen in the form of a formal RTI application under Section 6(1).[3] The NDA Government needs to demonstrate its commitment to transparency and accountability by complying with the requirements of the RTI Act. [read post]
22 May 2014, 7:16 pm
L. [read post]
14 Apr 2014, 8:37 am
This doesn’t seem to matter much to the FBI—the Bureau notes that because “this is an investigative search and caveats will be prevalent on the return detailing that the [non-FBI] agency is responsible for determining the identity of the subject, there should be NO legal issues. [read post]
4 Apr 2014, 11:58 am
Sheldon & L. [read post]
3 Apr 2014, 12:30 pm
Petition for review after the Court of Appeal affirmed in part and reversed in part the judgment in a civil action. [read post]
10 Mar 2014, 7:35 am
The bill would authorize members of a class to vote separately on any matter. [read post]
18 Feb 2014, 6:31 am
L. [read post]
6 Feb 2014, 8:35 pm
The court decided 104 civil cases (disregarding attorney discipline, juvenile and commitment matters). [read post]
5 Feb 2014, 10:05 am
How such a prosecution (or a similar civil lawsuit) would come out under American law is an interesting question. [read post]
5 Feb 2014, 6:25 am
L. [read post]
19 Jan 2014, 2:16 pm
The court noted that "[p]ublic allegations that someone is involved in crime generally are speech on a matter of public concern" and "even consumer complaints of non-criminal conduct by a business can constitute matters of public concern." [read post]
26 Dec 2013, 1:27 pm
Poss, Esquire, Kathryn L. [read post]
23 Dec 2013, 9:01 pm
Merely participating in spiritual or commitment ceremonies without any of the trappings of legal validity is not enough. [read post]
16 Dec 2013, 6:27 am
Jorgensen, [1995] 4 S.C.R. 55, Corporation de l’École Polytechnique v. [read post]
2 Dec 2013, 1:49 pm
I don’t believe the State ever explained why Ex parte Young is insufficient to shut down off-reservation gaming under the tribe’s MILSCA theory. [read post]
24 Oct 2013, 6:00 am
On October 17, 2013, Quebec’s Commission des droits de la personne et des droits de la jeunesse released an opinion on the government's policy paper, Orientations gouvernementales en matière d'encadrement des demandes d'accommodement religieux, d'affirmation des valeurs de la société québécoise ainsi que du caractère laïque des institutions de l'État (Charter of Quebec Values) previously discussed here and here. [read post]
26 Sep 2013, 11:00 am
The disclosures show no evidence of any intentional, unlawful spying on Americans or abuses of civil liberties. [read post]
23 Sep 2013, 9:01 pm
Should the State win, the matter very well could end up before that district court again. [read post]
