Search for: "Interest of Bc"
Results 501 - 520
of 2,065
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Oct 2011, 12:16 pm
For the past year there has been some debate amongst BC lawyers about the circumstances triggering Rule 15. [read post]
15 Feb 2013, 7:35 am
Holographic Wills in BC? [read post]
29 Apr 2016, 10:05 am
“ Owen Bird lawyer Dan Coles is always writing about something interesting at his BC-based Alcohol & Advocacy blog; this month was no exception with his fascinating post on the “Top 10 Liquor Laws from 1921“ That’s it for this month; we’ll be back at the end of May with more new & notables. [read post]
29 Apr 2016, 10:05 am
“ Owen Bird lawyer Dan Coles is always writing about something interesting at his BC-based Alcohol & Advocacy blog; this month was no exception with his fascinating post on the “Top 10 Liquor Laws from 1921“ That’s it for this month; we’ll be back at the end of May with more new & notables. [read post]
29 Apr 2016, 10:05 am
“ Owen Bird lawyer Dan Coles is always writing about something interesting at his BC-based Alcohol & Advocacy blog; this month was no exception with his fascinating post on the “Top 10 Liquor Laws from 1921“ That’s it for this month; we’ll be back at the end of May with more new & notables. [read post]
20 Nov 2008, 11:35 pm
She referred to the leading BC Court of Appeal case on this topic of Wong v. [read post]
13 Jul 2015, 9:01 pm
Reasons for judgement were released today by the BC Court of Appeal ordering a new trial after a document book was admitted ‘en masse’ along with a discovery transcript in a personal injury jury trial. [read post]
5 Apr 2013, 7:30 am
At para. 20, the court states: I am not satisfied that it is in the interests of justice to allow the withdrawal of the admission simply because Mr. [read post]
22 Jul 2013, 8:01 am
Adding to this site’s archives addressing non-pecuniary damages for traumatically induced thoracic outlet syndrome, reasons for judgement were released last week by the BC Supreme Court, Vancouver Registry, dealing with such an injury caused in a vehicle collision. [read post]
7 Jun 2016, 1:55 pm
Lampkin no longer plays cricket and is less interested in hobbies such as attending festivals, going to the beach or playing soccer. [read post]
5 Nov 2008, 11:31 pm
Reasons for judgement were released today by the BC Supreme Court determining the issue of fault for a single vehicle collision which occurred in Vernon, BC in 2004. [read post]
26 Feb 2010, 1:20 pm
The interests of justice are determined by ‘balancing the interests of the parties, which is a difficult and delicate matter requiring a careful consideration of all the elements of the case‘. [read post]
7 Feb 2011, 7:40 pm
On the one hand, the courts will look to the public interest in maintaining freedom of trade. [read post]
29 Aug 2017, 9:41 am
It is not in the interests of justice for the trier of fact to be deliberately mislead. [read post]
22 Dec 2008, 9:01 pm
Some of the more interesting expenses allowed, from my perspective, were 3 MRI scans paid for privately through Canadian Medial Imaging. [read post]
23 Oct 2012, 6:53 am
Terri Roman, Project Director of the Bronx Domestic Violence Complex reached out to our team in the interest that we could share our expertise and experience working with individuals arrested for prostitution.One of the goals of the presentation included highlighting the similarities in the experiences of those involved in intimate partner violence and individuals engaged in the life of prostitution. [read post]
19 Oct 2010, 4:35 am
At Courthouse Libraries BC we’ve been investigating tools you can use to organize case law of interest so we can share the most promising options on The Stream. [read post]
3 Sep 2015, 4:00 am
I have a serious interest in these topics: CLEBC publishes 50 titles: practice manuals, annotated precedents, and annotated statutes on BC law and practice. [read post]
3 Dec 2011, 11:52 am
Although not a BC case, interesting reasons for judgement were recently brought to my attention from the Suprerior Court of Jutice, Ontario, judicially criticizing an overly “protective approach” to the defence of a medical-malpractice lawsuit. [read post]
