Search for: "Iowa Law Review"
Results 501 - 520
of 2,737
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Sep 2021, 5:46 am
Two states – Iowa and Nebraska, have passed such legislation in 2021. [read post]
22 Oct 2009, 3:30 pm
I wonder if the Court would consider asking Iowa state law schools to forgo a semester of law school tuition? [read post]
9 Mar 2020, 9:00 am
Founded in 2004, Fastpath is recognized as a leader in security, audit and compliance specializing in access certification and segregation of duties, reviews and monitoring. [read post]
1 Aug 2011, 7:07 am
New laws affecting the courts in each state will be examined based on the order of adjournment. [read post]
26 Jan 2014, 3:01 pm
He was a star student, graduating first in his class and serving as Editor-in-Chief of the Iowa Law Review. [read post]
5 Jul 2012, 9:42 am
Adam Chodorow (Arizona State) has posted to SSRN his article Death and Taxes and Zombies, forthcoming in the Iowa Law Review. [read post]
9 Mar 2011, 5:28 pm
In addition to his writings on Patently-O, Professor Rantanen has written several law review articles, including a fascinating empirical study of inequitable conduct cases currently being published in the Southern California Law Review (with Lee Petherbridge and Ali Mojibi). [read post]
15 Feb 2011, 9:47 pm
Cunningham (George Washington University Law School) has posted A New Legal Theory to Test Executive Pay: Contractual Unconscionability (Iowa Law Review, Vol. 96, 2011) on SSRN. [read post]
20 May 2024, 4:30 am
Abraham (University at Buffalo Law School) has posted Segregation Autopilot: How the Government Perpetuates Segregation and How to Stop It (Iowa Law Review, Vol. 107, No. 1963, 2022) on SSRN. [read post]
16 Oct 2024, 4:30 am
Jonathan Remy Nash (Emory University School of Law) has posted Chevron Stare Decisis in A Post-Loper Bright World (Iowa Law Review Online, Forthcoming) on SSRN. [read post]
14 Feb 2020, 9:30 pm
Via our friends at Iowa Law, word of a faculty fellowship position, appointed at the rank of Visiting Assistant Professor of Law. [read post]
22 Jun 2023, 9:05 pm
IN THE NEWS The Iowa Supreme Court declined to lift a block on the state’s six-week abortion ban which a lower court had established after Iowa Governor Kim Reynolds signed the ban into law in 2018. [read post]
8 Nov 2011, 5:11 pm
Recently, the United States Supreme Court declined to review the Iowa Supreme Court's ruling with respect to physical presence and substantial tax nexus. [read post]
24 Jul 2023, 4:00 am
Jessie Hill, Due Process, Delegation, and Private Veto Power, 108 Iowa Law Review 1199-1246 (2023). [read post]
28 Sep 2011, 12:48 pm
The 'California Rule' and its Impact on Public Pension Reform (Iowa Law Review, Vol. 97, 2012) on SSRN. [read post]
1 Jan 2020, 6:03 am
Washburn University of Iowa College of Law Incorporation Without Assimilation: Legislating Tribal Civil Jurisdiction Over Non-Members UCLA Law Review Discourse, Forthcoming, University of Utah College of Law Research Paper No. 335 Number of pages: 29 Posted: 23 Sep 2019 Last Revised: 06 Nov 2019 [118 downloads] Working Paper Series Alexander Tallchief Skibine University of Utah – S.J. [read post]
27 Mar 2020, 9:50 am
The Court reviewed the mortgage and Iowa Code § 654.12A. [read post]
11 Apr 2024, 9:48 pm
Iowa Governor Kim Reynolds signed a bill into law that criminalizes “illegal reentry” on the state level. [read post]
14 Feb 2023, 12:25 pm
Here is the abstract: This Essay, prepared for the Iowa Law Review’s 2022 Symposium on the Future of Free Exercise, argues that religious exemptions to generally applicable law (or overly generous ‘most favored nation’ interpretations of the concept of religious discrimination which amount in practice to exemptions) should not be extended to members of faith groups with sufficient political, economic, or social power to defend themselves… [read post]
17 Mar 2009, 7:36 am
View the SSRN article here Archived Documents 02/26/2009 Asmara Tekle-Johnson Thurgood Marshall School of Law Iowa Law Review, Vol. 94, No. 2, 2009 Abstract: At first glance, sex-offender residency restrictions appear plausible because they ostensibly place a convicted sex offender's residence out of reach of children. [read post]
