Search for: "Israel v. United States" Results 501 - 520 of 1,275
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Sep 2012, 10:00 am by PaulKostro
Div. 2004) (examining father’s admission in the record that one-year visit to Israel was intended to be temporary for purposes of child custody matters); (2) whether the parent remaining in the claimed home state believed the absence to be merely temporary, see Sullivan v. [read post]
19 Feb 2014, 4:12 am
Under [federal immigration regulations], Nabil (and Sawsan, derivatively) would be deportable … if Nabil and Sawsan were actually married when Nabil entered the United States. [read post]
30 May 2014, 9:20 am by Amy Howe
”  Last fall the Court invited the Solicitor General to file a brief expressing the views of the United States. [read post]
25 Jan 2010, 3:51 am
(IP finance) The UK IP Office issues a Virgin trademark ruling that contrasts the Israel approach (IP Factor) EWHC (Pat): Article 27 (to prevent parallel proceedings in different member states) requires flexible approach to meaning of ‘same parties’: Mölnlycke Health Care AB (MAB), Mölnlycke Health care Limited (MUK) v. [read post]
10 Sep 2013, 8:00 am by Raffaela Wakeman
You’ve likely heard:  in a bid to avert action by the United States, Russia has proposed that Syria abandon its chemical weapons stockpiles. [read post]
4 Aug 2015, 11:09 am by Tara Hofbauer
[could potentially complicate] matters for President Vladimir V. [read post]
4 Aug 2015, 11:09 am by Tara Hofbauer
[could potentially complicate] matters for President Vladimir V. [read post]
17 Dec 2015, 10:33 am by John Elwood
United States ex rel. [read post]
3 Jul 2011, 11:08 pm by Marie Louise
(Class 99) (Afro-IP)   United Kingdom EWHC (Ch): Plane users can’t tell airlines from airways: United Airlines Inc v United Airways Limited (IPKat) PPC page 32: Quickstep – are there difficulties changing course with 8 tentacles? [read post]
1 Apr 2016, 1:33 pm by Alex R. McQuade
Yesterday, the United States and Saudi Arabia announced their new united front when it comes to sanctioning terrorist organizations. [read post]
14 Aug 2011, 11:31 pm by Marie Louise
(America-Israel Patent Law) (America-Israel Patent Law) Israel Supreme Court rules that rights owners should bear the costs of destroying infringing goods stopped by customs where collecting from the importer is not possible: 10 Israel Customs v. [read post]
25 Feb 2013, 4:31 am by Susan Brenner
And according to this article in the New York Times, Professor Golb’s views attracted limited support from other scholars, and none from any major academics in the United States. [read post]
13 Sep 2019, 6:00 am by Guest Blogger
For example, Chief Justice Warren’s deferential approach to Congress in United States v. [read post]
9 Nov 2015, 11:40 am by Elina Saxena, Cody M. Poplin
Meanwhile, the United States is intensifying its own campaign against the Islamic State in Syria. [read post]
22 Apr 2014, 4:11 am by Amy Howe
  Other coverage comes from Katie Barlow and Nina Totenberg at NPR, while in his “Drama at the Court” series for ISCOTUSnow, Christopher Schmidt looks back at United States v. [read post]
15 Feb 2017, 9:30 am by Jordan Brunner
”   As Trump meets with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu today, the Hill notes that the Trump administration will not insist on a two-state solution for Israel and Palestine. [read post]