Search for: "J. DOe" Results 501 - 520 of 28,593
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Apr 2023, 9:33 pm by Anna Bower, Benjamin Wittes
Judge Juan Merchan of the Supreme Court of New York opens the hearing by asking both the government and counsel for former President Donald J. [read post]
11 Apr 2012, 3:03 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
  In Angeles v Aronsky   2012 NY Slip Op 30851(U)  April 2, 2012  Sup Ct, NY County  Docket Number: 100091/2009  Judge: Judith J. [read post]
9 Jun 2013, 5:01 pm by oliver randl
The board adds that quite apart from the mentioned specific legal provisions under the EPC, bringing completely new and contradicting facts at such a late stage of the proceedings clearly goes against the general duty of fairness and good faith in the proceedings – whether towards the court(here the board) or the other party –, such a general duty being a generally recognised principle of procedural law in the contracting States (A 125).[3.9] First of all, the board notes that once the… [read post]
24 Apr 2012, 5:01 pm by Oliver
As can be seen from the basic proposition for a revision of the EPC of October 13, 2000 (MR/2/00, Number 6, A 122), the lawmaker wanted to keep the possibility of re-establishment into the time limit for further processing, which had been acknowledged by the case law (J 12/92 [3.2.2]; J 29/94 [3], J 902/87 [2.2-4]). [read post]
2 Feb 2012, 5:01 pm by Oliver G. Randl
Moreover, R 30(3), second sentence, provides that if the applicant does not furnish the required sequence listing and pay the required late furnishing fee within a period of two months after such an invitation, the application shall be refused. [read post]
10 Jul 2010, 11:02 am by Oliver G. Randl
In other words, the reimbursement of a fee requires there to be special provision (see for example decision J 33/86). [read post]
9 Oct 2007, 4:33 am
Does Texas Really Have More Doctors as a Result of Medical Malpractice Reform? [read post]
7 Sep 2010, 3:54 pm by war
Bennett J’s reasons for ruling that Fairfax does not hold copyright in the Australian Financial Review’s headlines have now been published. [read post]