Search for: "James v United States" Results 501 - 520 of 5,334
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Jul 2012, 3:00 am by Brennan W. Bolt
On Friday District of Columbia District Court Judge James Boasberg issued an opinion reaffirming his ruling striking down the National Labor Relations Board's "quickie election" rules in Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America v. [read post]
5 Dec 2008, 7:22 pm
"High court to hear enemy combatant case": Mark Sherman of The Associated Press has a report that begins, "The Supreme Court agreed Friday to decide whether the president may order that people picked up in the United States be detained indefinitely and without criminal charges. [read post]
22 Apr 2015, 12:11 pm by Rory Little
United States – which was a product of the residual clause itself — has generated. [read post]
12 Mar 2010, 2:11 pm by ToddHenderson
Or, looking at the issue another way, does the fact that the conduct permitted by Citizens United was legal in 26 states prior to Citizens United, suggest that politicians are hopelessly corrupt in over half our states? [read post]
25 Jun 2018, 2:23 pm
” Waltersheid, The Early Evolution of the United States Patent Law: Antecedents (Part 3), 77 J. [read post]
3 Dec 2013, 9:14 am by Will Baude
(Will Baude) Justice Scalia’s opinion today in United States v. [read post]
25 Mar 2009, 12:00 pm
Professor Ely notes that, since World War II, few property disputes have sparked widespread public interest and debate like the United States Supreme Court's decision in Kelo v. [read post]
7 Jan 2013, 10:30 am by Wells Bennett
Additionally, a motions hearing in United States v. [read post]
12 Jul 2016, 7:04 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
An excerpt: The Poarch Band of Creek Indians (“Poarch Band”) sued James Hildreth, Tax Assessor of Escambia County, Alabama, for declaratory and injunctive relief to prevent the assessment of property taxes on lands owned by the Poarch Band in Escambia County, Alabama, and held in trust by the United States (“Trust Property”). [read post]
30 Oct 2019, 3:47 am by Edith Roberts
At Vox (via How Appealing), Ian Millhiser argues that United States v. [read post]
13 Nov 2009, 8:05 pm by Sex Crimes
Reason Magazine has an interesting article supporting the Respondent in the upcoming United States v. [read post]
22 Jun 2011, 2:00 am by Stefanie Levine
On June 20, 2011, the United States Supreme Court granted Mayo's petition for certiorari in Prometheus Laboratories, Inc. v. [read post]
22 Jun 2011, 2:00 am by Stefanie Levine
On June 20, 2011, the United States Supreme Court granted Mayo's petition for certiorari in Prometheus Laboratories, Inc. v. [read post]
6 Dec 2016, 1:45 am by Blog Editorial
  Lord Pannick QC says it is no answer for the Government to say that the long title to the 1972 Act “says nothing about withdrawal“. 16:04: Lord Pannick QC refers to the case of Robinson v Secretary of State for Northern Ireland, which he submits supports a “flexible response” to constitutional developments. [read post]