Search for: "Jennings v. State" Results 501 - 520 of 585
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 May 2007, 7:30 pm
The big case decided by the Supreme Court of the United States this past week, at least for patent attorneys like the host of last week's Blawg Review #106, was KSR v Teleflex. [read post]
12 Sep 2022, 9:00 pm by Kyle Hulehan
Notably, Romer and Romer’s study was completed with U.S. federal income tax data, not state level data. [read post]
24 Jul 2022, 12:05 am by Frank Cranmer
Rosalind English, UK Human Rights Blog: Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act can be “read down” to accord with Convention family rights: comments on Jennings v Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority [2022] EWHC (Fam) (22 June 2022). [read post]
26 Nov 2007, 7:49 am
Box 308 Faribault, MN 55021-0308 Phone: (507) 332-5491 (V/TTY); (800) 657-3936 (V/TTY/Toll Free) DEAF, Inc. 413 Wacouta Street Suite 300 St. [read post]
16 Nov 2023, 4:00 am by jonathanturley
The five-page State Department memo was signed by 100 State and U.S. [read post]
4 Oct 2016, 6:55 pm by Kevin LaCroix
I would like to thank David and Jen for their willingness to publish their article as a guest post on this site. [read post]
23 Apr 2018, 8:28 am by Dan Carvajal
Key Findings Property tax limitations have been adopted in forty-six states and the District of Columbia, though their designs and restrictiveness differ widely. [read post]
3 Apr 2013, 7:48 am by William G. Ross
  During the next four years, the Court’s decisions, particularly Miranda v. [read post]
10 Jan 2022, 4:01 pm by INFORRM
Nicklin J found that, because Ms Murray’s tweet was stated as fact, it had one meaning; the defence of truth failed. [read post]
29 Mar 2023, 9:01 pm by renholding
“Stewards” of personal data should expect demanding requirements but with the hope for a federal standard that could lead to greater harmonization of the existing state-by-state patchwork. [read post]
20 Feb 2009, 12:32 am
Chung highlights Justice Field's dissent in Juilliard v. [read post]