Search for: "Jewell v. State"
Results 501 - 520
of 683
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Mar 2013, 10:45 am
(WWD) Costco’s CEO, Craig Jelinek, defended his company by stating that the word “Tiffany” was meant to describe the engagement rings’ setting and not to suggest the Tiffany brand. [read post]
23 Mar 2013, 11:18 pm
” More about the Kirtsaeng v. [read post]
11 Mar 2013, 8:10 am
Yes, there will be full employment of all personal injury lawyers in this state, and the lawyers will be happy. [read post]
1 Mar 2013, 7:20 am
But the real jewel is the third claim, which states unequivocally that blocking orders do work really well, and that the result is a clear reduction in traffic against the sites. [read post]
25 Feb 2013, 3:28 am
Eastland Music Group, LLC v. [read post]
20 Feb 2013, 11:00 am
On Valentine’s Day, appropriately enough perhaps, Tiffany (the jeweler, not the singer) filed a complaint against Costco in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, asserting a variety of trademark-related causes of action. [read post]
8 Feb 2013, 12:01 pm
* State Courts Bulletin Cases featured:Northern Cheyenne Tribe v. [read post]
3 Feb 2013, 9:22 am
United States v. [read post]
23 Jan 2013, 12:29 pm
Two of these patents - the '881 patent and the '564 patent (GB No. 2,317,564)- were subject to this morning's Court of Appeal decision in Omnipharm v Merial [2013] EWCA Civ 2. [read post]
17 Jan 2013, 3:56 pm
Specifically, in United States v. [read post]
17 Jan 2013, 10:56 am
Specifically, in United States v. [read post]
4 Jan 2013, 4:33 am
” — from Employment Discrimination Report Bad “Business Judgment” is not Discrimination – Veronese v. [read post]
29 Nov 2012, 9:58 am
On October 15, 2012, the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit issued its opinion in Jovani Fashion, Ltd. v. [read post]
28 Nov 2012, 6:42 am
The House Judiciary Committee will be holding a hearing on music licensing today at 11:30EST. [read post]
21 Oct 2012, 9:46 am
In 1984 in Berkemer v. [read post]
15 Oct 2012, 3:58 pm
Its case Jewel v. [read post]
8 Oct 2012, 12:58 pm
Connell v. [read post]
1 Oct 2012, 4:02 pm
But also I can tell you just from personal experience, I remember Bush v. [read post]
11 Sep 2012, 10:40 am
One of the key questions at stake is whether Section 5 imposes a heavy burden on the states (an important step in evaluating whether Section 5 is “congruent and proportional,” to use the City of Boerne v. [read post]
8 Sep 2012, 8:01 am
Essential patents are therefore often seen as the crown jewels. [read post]
