Search for: "John Elwood" Results 501 - 520 of 643
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Nov 2024, 2:54 pm by Amy Howe
(John Elwood and Kal Golde both discuss the cases in more detail in recent stories for SCOTUSblog.) [read post]
30 Jul 2017, 12:13 pm by Andrew Hamm
Judging from the Twitter reactions of multiple Supreme Court practitioners and commentators, the most appealing element of the update – what John Elwood called a “tantalizing glimpse” – may be the light at the end of this newly-opened tunnel. [read post]
14 Feb 2011, 6:46 am by James Bickford
  At the Volokh Conspiracy, John Elwood looks at the restrictions on briefs that can be filed by recent government employees. [read post]
11 Sep 2012, 9:11 pm by Walter Olson
Cato files amicus in raisin-farmer takings case [Ilya Shapiro] “What Were They Thinking: The Supreme Court in Revue 2011″ [John Elwood & Eric White, Green Bag, PDF] Tweet Tags: eminent domain, Fourth Amendment, New Hampshire, Supreme Court Constitution and Supreme Court roundup is a post from Overlawyered - Chronicling the high cost of our legal system [read post]
21 Apr 2025, 3:34 pm by Amy Howe
(John Elwood discussed the case in more detail in his Relist Watch column last week.) [read post]
6 Jan 2012, 5:07 am by Jonathan H. Adler
 Recall our own John Elwood has also taken the opposite view. [read post]
14 Dec 2009, 11:48 pm by Kedar
Several commentators, most notably John Elwood on Volokh Conspiracy and Tony Mauro for the Legal Times, have considered the possible reasons and consequences of the Court’s rather delinquent decision. earlier this year I took a look at the cases from OT07 that took longer-than-expected and the stats generally support what the pundits have said. [read post]
28 Apr 2010, 6:35 am by Adam Chandler
Briefly: At the Volokh Conspiracy, John Elwood predicts which Justices are writing the outstanding decisions from the November and December sittings. [read post]
13 Oct 2023, 12:16 pm by Amy Howe
The justices agreed to decide two other cases, both of which John Elwood covered in more detail in his Relist Watch column on Wednesday: Cantero v. [read post]
21 Nov 2023, 5:40 am by Will Baude
(Thanks to John Elwood and Matt Hellman for comments on an earlier draft of this post.)The post Arthur D. [read post]
13 Nov 2013, 11:49 am by Rory Little
§ 924(c), the “crime with a long name” as Rosemond’s counsel John Elwood noted). [read post]
4 Jan 2012, 8:39 am by Jonathan H. Adler
SECOND UPDATE: I just noticed John Elwood beat me to it. [read post]
21 Sep 2011, 6:39 am by Conor McEvily
  Regular blog contributor John Elwood of Vinson & Elkins observes that although the Court in recent years has not yet resolved the status of “manifest disregard” as a ground for vacating arbitral awards made under the FAA, it may well do so soon. [read post]
2 Sep 2014, 5:08 am by Amy Howe
   And John Elwood, a frequent contributor to this blog, is among the counsel to the petitioner in Holt v. [read post]
18 Feb 2020, 3:40 am by Edith Roberts
” For this blog, John Elwood breaks down a new memorandum from the Supreme Court clerk’s office “addressing cert-stage pleadings and the scheduling of cases for consideration at the court’s periodic conferences,” which explains “in detail a number of the court’s practices on cert-stage scheduling that in the past largely traveled by word of mouth. [read post]
9 Jan 2012, 11:40 am by Jack Goldsmith
  On this topic I recommend this op-ed by Bush OLC-ers Steve Bradbury and John Elwood. [read post]
15 Nov 2013, 6:05 am by Amy Howe
Also at this blog, John Elwood looks at the cases that were relisted from last week’s Conference. [read post]
16 Sep 2014, 7:10 am by Amy Howe
  [Disclosure:  John Elwood, a frequent contributor to this blog, is among the counsel to the petitioner in Elonis.] [read post]
8 Jan 2007, 8:29 pm
  Baker Botts assumed this obligation when it gobbled up Miller Cassidy, a firm whose former clerk (John Elwood) had brought fame to the Updates. [read post]
28 Nov 2011, 7:50 am by Kali Borkoski
As John Elwood noted in his November 10 Relist Watch, the Court had been holding one of today’s granted petitions, Hill v. [read post]