Search for: "John Elwood"
Results 501 - 520
of 674
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Oct 2011, 4:53 pm
John Elwood reviews the cases relisted after the Long Conference. [read post]
27 Sep 2011, 3:47 am
Jackson: Delegating to arbitrator power to determine arbitrability, Steven Bennett The uncertain future of the “manifest disregard” doctrine, John Elwood Class actions in the wake of Concepcion, Michael Rubin Eliminating class actions – a tsunami in the wake of AT&T Mobility v. [read post]
21 Sep 2011, 6:39 am
Regular blog contributor John Elwood of Vinson & Elkins observes that although the Court in recent years has not yet resolved the status of “manifest disregard” as a ground for vacating arbitral awards made under the FAA, it may well do so soon. [read post]
20 Sep 2011, 10:00 am
The following contribution to our arbitration symposium is by John Elwood. [read post]
12 Sep 2011, 7:56 am
We are grateful to the following authors who have agreed to contribute to this symposium: Hiro Aragaki – Loyola Law School, Los Angeles Steve Bennett – Jones Day Thomas Carbonneau – Penn State Dickinson School of Law Lawrence Cunningham – George Washington University School of Law Christopher Drahozal – University of Kansas School of Law John Elwood – Vinson & Elkins and University of Virginia School of Law Brian Fitzpatrick –… [read post]
1 Jul 2011, 2:45 pm
(John Elwood) So as all of you doubtless already know (and probably discussed over lunch), today the D.C. [read post]
30 Jun 2011, 8:01 am
John Elwood at the Volokh Conspiracy points us to certpool.com, a website that tracks certiorari petitions in the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
29 Jun 2011, 7:54 pm
(John Elwood) Now that the real business of October Term 2010 is over, I just wanted to say a few words in praise of the cert pool. [read post]
28 Jun 2011, 10:30 am
(John Elwood) That is about how long it has been since DOJ’s Office of Legal Counsel had a confirmed head. [read post]
28 Jun 2011, 10:05 am
The Office has had a confirmed AAG for less than three of the past 15 years, and not since 2004 [UPDATE: John Elwood calculates that it's been 2524 days -- and who am I differ?]. [read post]
27 Jun 2011, 8:41 am
The Court will hold a “clean-up Conference” today (see John Elwood’s post for more details), with orders to be announced tomorrow at 10:00 a.m. [read post]
JOHN ELWOOD REVIEWS Ward Farnsworth’s Classical English Rhetoric. “Law students and young lawyers s…
23 Jun 2011, 5:03 am
JOHN ELWOOD REVIEWS Ward Farnsworth’s Classical English Rhetoric. [read post]
22 Jun 2011, 8:00 am
(John Elwood) Back in April, Eugene blogged this book, written by my friend, fellow Justice Kennedy alumnus, and fellow Rolling Stones fan Ward Farnsworth, who is a law professor at Boston University. [read post]
22 Jun 2011, 6:44 am
And even suits by individual employees against big companies regularly demand, and sometimes get, million-dollar damages.The message of this ruling is simple: Employees have to prove that they have been legally wronged, not just cash in because somebody else was.In addition, our own John Elwood contributed a short commentary on Wal-Mart v. [read post]
22 Jun 2011, 5:26 am
, with contributions by: Suzette Malveaux Matthew Bodie Ralph Richard Banks John Elwood Tanya Hernandez Richard Primus Melissa Hart --A [read post]
20 Jun 2011, 6:39 am
And John Elwood of the Volokh Conspiracy and this blog provides an update on a case considered at last week’s Conference, United States v. [read post]
18 Jun 2011, 12:52 pm
(John Elwood) The government’s February 2010 cert. petition in United States v. [read post]
18 Jun 2011, 7:50 am
As John Elwood notes below, this is not the first time this Administration has overruled OLC when the office did not reach a desired conclusion. [read post]
17 Jun 2011, 9:19 pm
(John Elwood) As Charlie Savage notes twice in the article Jonathan discusses below, the President and the Attorney General have the authority, in the hierarchical Executive Branch, to overrule the advice of OLC. [read post]
15 Jun 2011, 12:43 pm
[Disclosure: I mooted John Elwood, counsel for petitioner in this case, but I had no other involvement in the case.] [read post]
