Search for: "John Richards v. State" Results 501 - 520 of 2,089
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Jun 2014, 6:05 am by Amy Howe
” At the blog of the National Conference of State Legislatures, Lisa Soronen discusses the State and Local Legal Center’s amicus brief, as well as the issues at stake more broadly, in next Term’s North Carolina Board of Dental Examiners v. [read post]
21 Mar 2018, 3:55 am by Edith Roberts
Yesterday the court held unanimously in Cyan v. [read post]
10 Sep 2023, 12:08 am by David Pocklington
: on Green v The Lichfield Diocesan Board of Finance [2023] UKET 2409635/2022, which we noted here. [read post]
1 Mar 2013, 6:15 am by Rachel Sachs
Other coverage continued to focus on some of the other amicus briefs filed in Hollingsworth and United States v. [read post]
12 Nov 2019, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
Schwartz, The Spirit of the Constitution: John Marshall and the 200-Year Odyssey of McCulloch v. [read post]
25 Jun 2012, 7:39 am by Steve Hall
On Friday, the Arkansas Supreme Court ruled in Hobbs v. [read post]
8 Jun 2018, 4:16 am by Edith Roberts
” At Politico Magazine, Richard Primus considers the implications of the decision in Masterpiece for Trump v. [read post]
21 Apr 2015, 4:54 am by Amy Howe
  It heard oral arguments for the second time in Johnson v. [read post]
14 Oct 2010, 12:09 am by Robert Thomas (inversecondemnation.com)
On the panel are James Burling (Pacific Legal Foundation), John Echeverria (Vermont Law School), Richard Frank, University of California, Davis Law School), and Dan Stengle, (Hopping Green & Sams, Petitioner's counsel). [read post]
1 Sep 2017, 6:49 am by MOTP
The Parkers alleged that they are the sole beneficiaries of the Richard Parker Family Trust (the "trust"), created under the will of their father, Richard Joseph Parker, who is deceased, and intended for their "education, care, support, and maintenance" until they reached the age of 35. [read post]
4 Mar 2010, 8:23 am by Kurt Lash
Representing the petitioners in McDonald v. [read post]