Search for: "John S Peterson" Results 501 - 507 of 507
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Jan 2009, 2:06 am
That means there's no such thing as "one and done" in California. [read post]
6 Mar 2008, 12:19 pm by Thornhill Law Firm, APLC
• THE JUDGE’S DISCRETION: The admissibility of any videotape is within the discretion of the trial judge. [read post]
11 Sep 2009, 6:31 pm
Cir. 1986) (describing the analytical method as "subtract[ing] the infringer's usual or acceptable net profit from its anticipated net profit realized from sales of infringing devices"); see also John Skenyon et al., Patent Damages Law & Practice § 3:4, at 3-9 to 3-10 (2008) (describing the analytical method as "calculating damages based on the infringer's own internal profit projections for the infringing item at… [read post]