Search for: "Johnson v. Stevens"
Results 501 - 520
of 666
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 May 2010, 8:19 pm
In its opinion, the Court held that the Second Circuit’s decision, and its plain-error analysis, conflicted with the Court’s prior decisions interpreting Rule 52(b), such as Johnson v. [read post]
24 May 2010, 7:42 am
Among the cases the Court refused on Monday to hear were a test of the constitutional power of states to make state tax laws retroactive and in the process to wipe out pending refund claims under an invalid law (Johnson Controls, et al., v. [read post]
22 May 2010, 5:38 am
Consider, for example, how heavily today’s decision rested on the analysis in the Supreme Court’s 1950 decision in Johnson v. [read post]
22 May 2010, 5:19 am
Consider, for example, how heavily today’s decision rested on the analysis in the Supreme Court’s 1950 decision in Johnson v. [read post]
19 May 2010, 5:03 pm
Chief Justice Warren famously sought, and attained, consensus on perhaps the most important Supreme Court decision, Brown v. [read post]
13 May 2010, 10:08 am
Johnson. [read post]
13 May 2010, 7:38 am
Johnson, 515 U. [read post]
12 May 2010, 9:26 am
Johnson. [read post]
10 May 2010, 2:52 pm
In addition, although Thurgood Marshall served briefly on the 2nd Circuit, his most significant legal experience was as a litigator for the NAACP Legal Defense Fund and as Solicitor General in the Johnson Administration. [read post]
10 May 2010, 4:44 am
Next, in Johnson v. [read post]
10 May 2010, 2:59 am
"Healing ourselves is the essence of democratic development. [read post]
5 May 2010, 12:21 pm
During the term when I clerked for Stevens, Rutan v. [read post]
4 May 2010, 3:00 pm
Johnson (6:51), Stevens pointedly responded to an advocate who claimed that the government cannot regulate how flags are displayed, saying “I feel quite differently. [read post]
4 May 2010, 12:39 pm
” Justice Stevens’ dissent in Texas v. [read post]
30 Apr 2010, 6:56 am
In Young v. [read post]
26 Apr 2010, 1:30 pm
The Supreme Court subsequently reversed in a six-to-three ruling, with the majority opinion for five Justices written by Justice Stevens. [read post]
22 Apr 2010, 7:20 am
This is what happened in the case, Steven Woodward, et al, v. [read post]
20 Apr 2010, 9:13 pm
But also because I was jarred by the juxtaposition of his dissent in Johnson with his decision to join the 8-1 majority in yesterday's ruling in United States v. [read post]
14 Apr 2010, 11:00 am
In other cases, Justice Steven held in Johnson v. [read post]
8 Apr 2010, 6:37 am
Concurring Opinions also posts on a new essay from the Virginia Law Review about Rent-A-Center v. [read post]
