Search for: "Jones v. Black*" Results 501 - 520 of 854
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Jun 2020, 4:34 pm by INFORRM
  The judgment in the case of Smith v Jones [2020] NSWDC 262 was given on 28 May 2020. [read post]
1 Mar 2010, 7:11 pm
(ipeg) (IP Watch) Holding up products at EU borders using patents (ipeg) Improving the links between ESOs and the European Patent Office (IP:JUR) General Court affirms earlier Board of Appeal's decision that "James Jones" is confusingly similar to "JACK & JONES", in connection with clothing in Class 25 (Class 46) Clutter on the Community Trademark Register (SOLO Independent IP Practitioners) No strange aroma, but will Longkou Fen Si pass the test? [read post]
1 Mar 2010, 7:11 pm
(ipeg) (IP Watch) Holding up products at EU borders using patents (ipeg) Improving the links between ESOs and the European Patent Office (IP:JUR) General Court affirms earlier Board of Appeal's decision that "James Jones" is confusingly similar to "JACK & JONES", in connection with clothing in Class 25 (Class 46) Clutter on the Community Trademark Register (SOLO Independent IP Practitioners) No strange aroma, but will Longkou Fen Si pass the test? [read post]
9 Jan 2010, 4:17 am by Jeremy Saland
" The Velez case relied on by the court addresses the presumption issue in more detail: "The [car] presumption establishes a prima facie case against a defendant, who may, if he chooses, rebut it by interposing evidence to the contrary (People v Lemmons, 40 NY2d 505, 510; People v Jones, 57 AD2d 595). [read post]
9 Feb 2014, 3:07 pm
Now it's time to tell you all about the trial of the substantive issue -- and here to tell it is Cerryg Jones (head of Brands & Designs at Wragge & Co LLP, which acted for the successful claimant. [read post]
23 Nov 2015, 2:57 am
BSI Enterprises Ltd & Another v Blue Mountain Music Ltd [2015] EWCA Civ 1151, a Court of Appeal, England and Wales, ruling of 18 November 2015, is one of those decisions that looks as though it ought to be quite exciting because of its celebrity content but which actually has little or nothing to entertain the reader. [read post]
17 Feb 2022, 1:42 pm by ACLU
v=wfqUk0tdjkgUsing people’s names and pronouns is a matter of respect. [read post]
8 May 2020, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
  They narrate the story—in which the Cherokee Nation’s startling victory in Worcester v. [read post]
6 Mar 2022, 11:36 am by Katherine Pompilio
Kurup posted the unanimous court decision in FBI v. [read post]
4 May 2023, 9:30 pm by Karen Tani
  His poetic inclination is perhaps the most prominent in tort cases:  As Guido reflects on one of his first opinions, Taber v. [read post]