Search for: "Just Care Inc" Results 501 - 520 of 5,683
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 May 2012, 11:12 am by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
Health plans and their fiduciaries and sponsors need to keep in mind that Federal health care oversight and enforcement is not just about detecting provider misconduct. [read post]
17 Nov 2014, 6:50 am
Gilead Sciences, Inc., which is a big reason we cited the horrendous Murthy opinion from a couple years ago, in a case involving clinical trials that left us Dazed and Confused. [read post]
4 Oct 2018, 12:49 pm by Patrick A. Malone
Gilead Sciences Inc., facing steep competition from other makers and innovations from non-profits, has decided to sell cheaper, just as potent versions of its hep C fighting drugs Epclusa and Harvoni. [read post]
15 Dec 2010, 9:03 am
  Morris Jensby of CHG Healthcare Services, Inc. in Salt Lake City and Russ Schell, an eminent trial attorney from Schell Cooley in Dallas will explore this topic in depth from the perspective of both the corporate health care client and trial counsel. [read post]
18 May 2016, 1:13 pm by Louthian Law Firm
We hope that those who commit fraud will recognize that it is our goal to make the consequences more than just the cost of doing business. [read post]
23 Jun 2016, 10:21 am by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
A $180,000 wrongful termination settlement that Foothill Packing, Inc. just paid to settle Department of Labor charges illustrates the potential Catch-22 tightrope that employers must walk when choosing between citizens and resident aliens with visas for hiring and firing decisions. [read post]
25 May 2011, 6:14 am by Jonathan Rosenfeld
Decubitus ulcers, also known as: pressure sores, pressure ulcers or just bed sores are a horrific problem facing nursing home patients across the country. [read post]
25 Oct 2023, 3:46 am
The rate of affirmance for Section 2(d) refusals is running at just over 85% so far this year. [read post]
5 Dec 2014, 2:21 am
I once heard a TTAB judge say that the outcomes of most Section 2(d) likelihood of confusion cases can be predicted just by looking at the marks and the identified goods/services, without more. [read post]