Search for: "KING v. THE STATE" Results 501 - 520 of 6,162
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Nov 2014, 7:58 am by Brian Peterson
 There was, perhaps, some room for argument about what "subject to" meant, but the court cleared that up yesterday in King v. [read post]
10 Mar 2007, 2:20 pm
Special master Michael Patrick King ruled, in State v. [read post]
28 Dec 2012, 10:28 am by lennyesq
  The New York State Court of Appeals’ recent decision in Matter of Michael D’Angelo v Nicholas Scoppetta serves as an important reminder that the term “reprimand” may be interpreted more broadly than public employers anticipate. [read post]
28 Dec 2012, 10:28 am by lennyesq
  The New York State Court of Appeals’ recent decision in Matter of Michael D’Angelo v Nicholas Scoppetta serves as an important reminder that the term “reprimand” may be interpreted more broadly than public employers anticipate. [read post]
13 Oct 2014, 8:07 am
His play King Henry V is a sustained and powerful meditation on the interrelationships of all three. [read post]
18 Jan 2013, 10:00 am by Dan Ernst
A chorus of elite Australian lawyers told King George V and the public that the appointment of Isaacs on the advice of the Australian Prime Minister would be invalid under the Australian Constitution. [read post]
13 Jun 2017, 8:00 am by Dan Ernst
A v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2005]: The Belmarsh CaseRichard Clayton9. [read post]
26 Oct 2022, 6:58 am by INFORRM
In an earlier post on this blog, I considered the potential impact on the First Amendment of Thomas J’s originalist reasoning in the Second Amendment case of New York State Rifle and Pistol Association v Bruen, and found some distinctly chilly zephyrs. [read post]
3 Mar 2017, 2:34 pm by Kevin
Again, this is under the current laws passed by usurpers, but still, I think something more dramatic than just showing up is going to be necessary if Allan V. [read post]