Search for: "Kent Scheidegger"
Results 501 - 520
of 600
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Sep 2011, 9:04 am
Ann Richards oversaw 50 executions during her one term - and unlike Perry, she never commuted a death sentence.The irony here, points out Kent Scheidegger of the pro-death-penalty Criminal Justice Legal Foundation in Sacramento, is that Texas does not deserve its reputation as the most execution-prone state. [read post]
2 Jun 2010, 6:55 am
” Nonetheless, Kent Scheidegger of Crime and Consequences, is “particularly interested in knowing whether Ms. [read post]
6 Oct 2011, 5:29 am
Kent Scheidegger – The “cause and prejudice” rule is a corollary to the exhaustion rule. [read post]
2 Nov 2011, 6:24 am
Kent Scheidegger – The starting point here is to remember what a drastic measure it is to overturn a judgment for ineffective assistance of counsel. [read post]
3 Jul 2018, 5:32 am
Kent Scheidegger on Crime & Consequences looks at the consequence of replacing Kennedy in criminal cases; he does “not expect that the Kennedy-Whomever succession will come close on the Richter Scale to the Marshall-Thomas succession on matters of criminal law. [read post]
13 Jun 2018, 4:23 am
At Crime and Consequences, Kent Scheidegger remarks on the lack of criminal law action in Monday’s Supreme Court opinions and orders. [read post]
21 Apr 2010, 6:50 am
At Crime and Consequences, Kent Scheidegger reviews the committee report on the statute at issue in the case. [read post]
11 Jun 2019, 3:51 am
” Commentary comes from Kent Scheidegger at Crime & Consequences. [read post]
2 Feb 2017, 4:40 am
” Commentary on the appointment comes from Christina Cauterucci at Slate’s XX Factor blog, who looks at what Gorsuch’s nomination means for women, arguing that as “far as the health, safety, and civil rights of America’s women are concerned, it’s hard to imagine how the court could do worse”; Ilya Shapiro at the Cato Institute’s Cato at Liberty blog, who maintains that “Donald Trump has managed to pick a nominee who should please everyone other… [read post]
23 Jan 2018, 4:33 am
At Crime and Consequences, Kent Scheidegger calls the decision “a win for cops and for looking at evidence as a wall and not a collection of bricks. [read post]
3 Mar 2020, 3:40 am
” At Crime & Consequences, Kent Scheidegger questions Justice Sonia Sotomayor’s statement about the amount of time that passed between the enactment of two constitutional provisions. [read post]
12 Jan 2011, 6:19 am
The Associated Press (via the Fort Worth Star-Telegram) has the full story, and the stay was noted by Doug Berman at Sentencing Law and Policy and by Kent Scheidegger at Crime & Consequences. [read post]
11 Oct 2018, 4:16 am
” At Crime & Consequences, Kent Scheidegger weighs in on the debate over whether video cameras should be permitted in the Supreme Court courtroom, suggesting that the court “should not stream its arguments live but instead should make them available on video largely the same way it presently does in audio. [read post]
28 May 2010, 7:16 am
Kent Scheidegger at Crime and Consequences chides the Court for using the data without verification. [read post]
24 Sep 2009, 5:53 am
Kent Scheidegger at Crime and Consequences took a contrary position last week. [read post]
3 Oct 2017, 4:15 am
” Kent Scheidegger remarks on yesterday’s denials at Crime and Consequences. [read post]
14 May 2019, 4:08 am
” Commentary comes from Kent Scheidegger at Crime & Consequences. [read post]
17 Oct 2016, 4:36 am
” Additional coverage of the decision comes from Dan Sullivan and others in the Tampa Bay Times; commentary comes from Kent Scheidegger at Crime and Consequences. [read post]
24 May 2010, 7:48 pm
Kent Scheidegger has commentary on the decision at Crime and Consequences. [read post]
17 Jul 2007, 2:35 pm
" As Kent Scheidegger noted in his comments to Lyle's earlier post, Rule 37.6 has been revised to require that a merits amicus brief be filed "within 7 days after the brief for the party supported is filed, or if in support of neither party, within 7 days after the time allowed for filing the petitioner's or appellant's brief. [read post]
