Search for: "Kent Scheidegger" Results 501 - 520 of 623
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Oct 2016, 12:37 pm by CJLF Staff
  "It's a good reason not to go further down the same road," said CJLF legal director Kent Scheidegger. [read post]
28 Sep 2017, 4:05 am by Edith Roberts
At Crime and Consequences, Kent Scheidegger notes that the Supreme Court yesterday “officially adopted a few rule changes effective November 13” that “mainly related to electronic filing of documents. [read post]
14 Dec 2010, 6:41 am by Andrew Breidenbach
Kent Scheidegger at Crime and Consequences Blog laments the denial of cert. in Allen v. [read post]
26 Apr 2010, 9:23 am by CJLF Staff
  Our own Kent Scheidegger disagrees with Minsker. [read post]
30 Oct 2018, 3:50 am by Edith Roberts
” At Crime & Consequences, Kent Scheidegger observes that United States v. [read post]
31 Aug 2007, 8:05 am
"These cases are being reconsidered in a lot more detail than they need to be," says Kent Scheidegger, legal director of the Criminal Justice Legal Foundation, a victims' rights group based in California. [read post]
26 Nov 2019, 4:01 am by Edith Roberts
” At Crime & Consequences, Kent Scheidegger offers his take on the output from Friday’s conference. [read post]
5 Apr 2011, 6:36 am by Nabiha Syed
  Kent Scheidegger pinpoints questions left unanswered by the opinion at Crime and Consequences, while the Los Angeles Times, Sacramento Bee, JURIST, Courthouse News Service, and UPI all have coverage of the case. [read post]
26 Sep 2011, 7:19 am by Joshua Matz
Responding to criticism by Dahlia Lithwick and Lisa McElroy in the New York Times (which Kiera covered in Friday’s round-up), Kent Scheidegger countered at Crime and Consequences that “[u]nexplained denials are, of course, standard operating procedure at the discretionary review stage. [read post]
12 Jan 2012, 6:45 am by Nabiha Syed
  Other coverage comes from USA Today, the Washington Post, Christian Science Monitor, CNN, JURIST, AP, and Kent Scheidegger of Crime and Consequences; at ACSblog, Brandon Garrett compares the decision in Perry to the Court’s decision earlier this week in Smith v. [read post]
29 Jan 2016, 11:01 am by CJLF Staff
  CJLF legal director Kent Scheidegger agrees with other legal experts that the plan is "dismantling a system that was carefully put together over time," and fears the defense bar may even try to use the measure to gut the three-strikes law. [read post]
31 Aug 2015, 12:21 pm by CJLF Staff
"  Attorneys for death row inmates argue that the problem is not fixable; though CJLF legal director Kent Scheidegger emphasizes the state of Virginia's success in fixing their system and the execution of the D.C. sniper in less than six years. [read post]
12 Oct 2016, 4:28 am by Edith Roberts
Amy Howe reports on the decision for this blog; commentary comes from Kent Scheidegger at Crime and Consequences. [read post]
5 Nov 2015, 4:43 am by Amy Howe
News) covered the stay, while Kent Scheidegger weighs in at Crime and Consequences. [read post]
6 Jul 2011, 8:14 am by Conor McEvily
Kent Scheidegger of Crime and Consequences criticizes a recent Los Angeles Times article on Justice Thomas (to which Nabiha linked in yesterday’s round-up) as “skewed . . . to give the reader a distorted view of [the Justice’s] jurisprudence. [read post]
30 Nov 2011, 7:30 am by Conor McEvily
Kent Scheidegger at the blog Crime and Consequences also discusses Hill and Dorsey, commenting on a recent New York Times article on the cases, which Nabiha included in yesterday’s round-up. [read post]
27 Feb 2020, 3:40 am by Edith Roberts
At Crime & Consequences, Kent Scheidegger hopes that the Supreme Court will move quickly to replace Mathena v. [read post]
10 Jul 2017, 7:20 pm by Bill Otis
 You might want to try Kent Scheidegger at the CJLF in Sacramento. [read post]
22 Apr 2010, 9:05 am by Jeff Gamso
*Still, when Kent Scheidegger and I both agree that a law is unconstitutional, there's some likelihood that we're right. [read post]
25 Feb 2020, 4:02 am by Edith Roberts
Kent Scheidegger weighs in at Crime & Consequences on the court’s refusal to exercise its original jurisdiction to consider the dispute, agreeing with Justice Clarence Thomas, who dissented from the order, that the court’s discretionary approach to these cases may violate the Constitution. [read post]