Search for: "Kent Scheidegger" Results 501 - 520 of 601
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Apr 2010, 9:05 am by Jeff Gamso
*Still, when Kent Scheidegger and I both agree that a law is unconstitutional, there's some likelihood that we're right. [read post]
3 Oct 2010, 3:12 am by SHG
Unfortunately, party-pooper Kent Scheidegger, co-blogger with Otis, points out in the first comment that the list is a meaningless scam. [read post]
2 Sep 2011, 9:04 am by Steve Hall
Ann Richards oversaw 50 executions during her one term - and unlike Perry, she never commuted a death sentence.The irony here, points out Kent Scheidegger of the pro-death-penalty Criminal Justice Legal Foundation in Sacramento, is that Texas does not deserve its reputation as the most execution-prone state. [read post]
6 Oct 2011, 5:29 am by Aaron Tang
  Kent Scheidegger – The “cause and prejudice” rule is a corollary to the exhaustion rule. [read post]
2 Jun 2010, 6:55 am by Adam Chandler
” Nonetheless, Kent Scheidegger of Crime and Consequences, is “particularly interested in knowing whether Ms. [read post]
3 Jul 2018, 5:32 am by Andrew Hamm
Kent Scheidegger on Crime & Consequences looks at the consequence of replacing Kennedy in criminal cases; he does “not expect that the Kennedy-Whomever succession will come close on the Richter Scale to the Marshall-Thomas succession on matters of criminal law. [read post]
2 Nov 2011, 6:24 am by Kali Borkoski
  Kent Scheidegger – The starting point here is to remember what a drastic measure it is to overturn a judgment for ineffective assistance of counsel. [read post]
28 May 2010, 7:16 am by Erin Miller
 Kent Scheidegger at Crime and Consequences chides the Court for using the data without verification. [read post]
15 Oct 2013, 5:32 am by Amy Howe
At Crime and Consequences, Kent Scheidegger looks at the week ahead at the Court. [read post]
6 Mar 2015, 7:18 am by Amy Howe
At Crime and Consequences, Kent Scheidegger summarizes the criminal cases in that sitting. [read post]
24 Jan 2018, 3:55 am by Edith Roberts
” At Crime and Consequences, Kent Scheidegger observes that “[i]f the status of the ‘dreamers’ is fixed by statute” in the meantime, “then this will be one more case for the mootness bin. [read post]
20 Jan 2011, 6:34 am by Amanda Rice
  Although most coverage of the two cases focused on the Court’s treatment of the Ninth Circuit, Kent Scheidegger of Crime & Consequences looks at the broader picture, describing Harrington as “a landmark decision in the law of federal habeas corpus. [read post]
15 Jun 2010, 8:36 am by Jay Willis
  However, Kent Scheidegger of Crime and Consequences laments the lack of objective standards for determining threshold levels of attorney negligence, and he urges the Court to issue a clearer test for the issue next Term. [read post]
1 Jul 2019, 4:17 am by Edith Roberts
” At Crime & Consequences, Kent Scheidegger writes that the court’s decision in Mitchell v. [read post]
3 Aug 2010, 9:18 am by Jeff Gamso
  Kent Scheidegger, over at Crime & Consequences, thinks it only fair that my clients should be killed. [read post]
11 Oct 2017, 4:09 am by Edith Roberts
” Commentary comes from Kent Scheidegger at Crime and Consequences and Ilya Somin for The Washington Post’s Volokh Conspiracy blog, who remarks that “the legal battle over Trump’s  travel ban is far from over. [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 3:11 am by Amy Howe
”  At Crime and Consequences, Kent Scheidegger agrees with the Court that “[t]he asserted justifications for searching the phone immediately without a warrant are weak,” but he adds that “[t]he Fourth Amendment should not be a ground for excluding evidence from a criminal trial unless the police acted in bad faith. [read post]
17 Apr 2008, 8:27 am
The ruling Wednesday "should put an end to the de facto moratorium on the death penalty caused by legal challenges to this method of execution," said Kent Scheidegger of the Criminal Justice Legal Foundation, a nonprofit group that supports the death penalty. [read post]
20 Apr 2011, 6:25 am by Adam Chandler
Because of that voting pattern, Kent Scheidegger of Crime & Consequences observes, Justice Kennedy’s concurrence (joined by Justice Thomas) “should have a bit more clout than most concurrences, as Justices Kennedy and Thomas are necessary votes for the majority. [read post]
20 Dec 2007, 2:09 am
"For Kent Scheidegger, legal director of California's Criminal Justice Legal Foundation, the answer for Floridians is simple:"Justice is sometimes carried out," he said. [read post]