Search for: "LOWE v. U S" Results 501 - 520 of 619
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Jan 2007, 1:24 am
"Chiquet said 3rd marks Chanel's first-ever attempt to appeal to a low- or no-income consumer market, and is part of the fashion world's desire to "give something back" to developing countries that have offered much in the way of photo-shoot locales and labor outsourcing. [read post]
10 Jul 2022, 1:23 pm by Michael Ehline
Doe Texas-Based Oil Company (illegal u-turn collision) $8.7 million – Doe v. [read post]
16 Jan 2012, 12:47 pm by Angelo A. Paparelli
A relatively low standard of proof does not account for all societal interests involved in the issuance of immigration benefits. [read post]
25 Oct 2010, 8:10 am by Yvonne Renfrew
" Heckler Design's desk, constructed of steel, is actually two separate desks forged of metal into the shape of an inverted "U. [read post]
The format and the wording that is applied by authors in this text is quite variable, but this content may be still quite informative, as shown in some examples taken from Journal of Clinical Investigation, Heliyon, Nature Communication, Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, and Science. [read post]
9 Sep 2008, 5:00 am
Ten Reasons Why You Should Teach Here — And Three Why You Shouldn't (v. 2.0) 1. [read post]
16 Feb 2021, 8:49 am by Eugene Volokh
I will largely leave to others prescriptions about what is to be done; but I hope my analysis might help us think through such matters. [1] See, e.g., Doe v. [read post]
30 Jul 2010, 8:00 am by J Robert Brown Jr.
Section 21F(c)(2) sets forth other persons not eligible to receive awards.75 Section 21F(h)(1)(C).76 Section 21F(h)(1)(B)(iii).77 Section 934 of the Act, adding § 15(u) to the 1934 Act.78 Section 935 of the Act, adding § 15(v) to the 1934 Act.79 Section 922(c)(2) of the Act, adding 18 U.S.C. [read post]
5 Dec 2017, 2:27 am by Keith Mallinson
In some jurisdictions, even the royalties ultimately awarded can be derisorily low. [read post]
21 Jun 2021, 11:36 am by Ilya Somin
  The NCAA didn't just lose in today's Supreme Court decision in NCAA v. [read post]