Search for: "Lawing v. Miller" Results 501 - 520 of 6,143
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 May 2017, 11:27 am
This is one of those cases in which I'm not entirely sure why the panel decides to certify the state law question to the state supreme court.More accurately, I know why the panel wants to certify the question. [read post]
15 Dec 2013, 7:00 pm by Kevin O'Neill
By Kevin O’Neill In a recent British Columbia Supreme Court decision, Gerry Miller v. [read post]
3 Jul 2024, 7:41 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
The plaintiffs lost at trial and they appeal to the Second Circuit, which agrees the case must be dismissed.The case is Miller v. [read post]
29 Aug 2006, 9:38 am
Over at The Fire of Genius, Joe Miller has a series of posts, inspired by the briefs in KSR International v. [read post]
5 Dec 2016, 2:30 am by Blog Editorial
This is inherent in the creation of domestic law. 11.58: James Eadie QC states that consistently with dualism, legislation creates a conduit between international and domestic law. [read post]
26 Mar 2014, 1:36 pm
Miller . . . called Law back and said such a taxi had just passed him. [read post]
24 Nov 2019, 10:10 am by Donald Dinnie
The case of R (Miller) v The Prime Minister and Cherry v Advocate General for Scotland dealt with whether the advice given by the UK Prime Minister to Her Majesty the Queen to prorogue Parliament (that is, discontinue its session) for a number of days between September and October 2019 was lawful. [read post]
24 Jun 2008, 9:41 am
The test for obscenity, laid out in the 1973 Supreme Court case of Miller v. [read post]
20 Mar 2015, 1:35 pm
 Miller having satisfied all known tests for retroactivity, Miller applies retroactively.In Horsely v. [read post]
9 Aug 2014, 7:32 am by The Law Office of Philip D. Cave
Colin Miller, one of my favorite bloggers on evidence, addresses a best evidence issue raised in People v. [read post]
18 Jul 2017, 11:53 am by Phil Dixon
Miller: Ongoing Emergency, Prior Opportunity for Cross, and Forfeiture In State v. [read post]