Search for: "Lilly v. State"
Results 501 - 520
of 915
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Sep 2021, 10:37 am
Plaintiffs in Grimes v. [read post]
10 Jun 2014, 7:44 pm
In this post, guest contributor Paul England (Taylor Wessing LLP) explains the legal issues and their consequences:UKIPO -- a 'court' for the purposes of the Brussels I Regulation Some courts look like this ...With Actavis v Eli Lilly [noted on the IPKat here] still fresh in our minds, and amendments to the Brussels I Regulation (recast) progressing through the European Parliament in preparation for the Unified Patent Court, jurisdictional matters are a hot… [read post]
24 Jun 2009, 2:09 pm
The case was Gross v. [read post]
22 Nov 2011, 10:18 am
McCoyd v. [read post]
14 Jan 2009, 2:42 pm
As a result, the plaintiff, Lilly M. [read post]
5 May 2021, 4:59 am
How Not to Read the Eli Lilly vs Canada Award” Commentator: Rochelle Dreyfuss 12:10 PM ET Christopher S. [read post]
4 Dec 2014, 9:05 pm
If more editors handled situations this way, readers would think better of the press: Annalee Newitz of io9 offers “apology and analysis” for running tendentious, ill-reported article attacking animal-based research; Success of personal injury litigation is reshaping nursing home business in some states [WSJ] “With the Advent of Mandatory Paid Sick Leave in California, Here are a Few Sick Leave Excuses” [Coyote, related Massachusetts] Really, it’s not a… [read post]
2 Jul 2010, 5:00 pm
Eli Lilly & Co., 113 F.3d 1426, 1429 (6th Cir. 1997) ("A federal court in a diversity case is not free to engraft onto state rules exceptions or modifications which may commend themselves to the federal court, but which have not commended themselves to the State in which the federal court sits") (refusing to adopt [read post]
8 Jan 2009, 4:07 am
Eli Lilly & Co., 536 F. [read post]
28 Nov 2022, 8:26 am
A common one is the absence of knowledge of the wrongdoing, as demonstrated in the case of L’Oréal SA v eBay International AG, where the High Court stated that eBay “did not know that such infringements had occurred and were likely to continue to occur” and this (amongst other factors) were not enough to make eBay liable as joint tortfeasors. [read post]
28 Feb 2011, 8:19 am
Eli Lilly & Co., 119 F.3d 1559, 1566 (Fed. [read post]
28 Feb 2011, 8:19 am
Eli Lilly & Co., 119 F.3d 1559, 1566 (Fed. [read post]
21 May 2009, 2:00 am
Eli Lilly & Co.) [read post]
30 Sep 2010, 2:29 pm
P. 8(a) adopted by the United States Supreme Court in Ashcroft v. [read post]
17 Dec 2009, 9:29 am
In Ricci v. [read post]
10 Jan 2011, 6:46 am
”And one of my new favorites:In Pappas v. [read post]
6 Jul 2007, 4:29 am
We've already deplored the recent decision of the West Virginia Supreme Court rejecting the learned intermediary rule outright, State ex rel. [read post]
30 Oct 2013, 8:32 am
Eli Lilly & Co., 598 F.3d 1336, 1351 (Fed. [read post]
3 Apr 2019, 9:32 am
Eli Lilly (the Second Appellant), is the exclusive licensee. [read post]
13 Aug 2019, 6:03 am
Patents In Nokia v. [read post]
