Search for: "Lists of Jurors v."
Results 501 - 520
of 1,122
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Dec 2014, 7:59 am
") AC35789 - Collazo v. [read post]
11 Dec 2014, 11:23 am
In DeWolf v. [read post]
3 Dec 2014, 4:13 am
’ Juror 2 then mentioned that while `they said the trial would be three weeks,’ having `seen the witness list now, . . . [read post]
2 Dec 2014, 9:28 am
The case is United States v. [read post]
20 Nov 2014, 8:36 am
Without a legal definition of predisposition, jurors are left to weigh the listed factors in the abstract, or perhaps to weigh them against an intuitive understanding of the term. [read post]
11 Nov 2014, 7:00 am
Sep. 29, 2014); Tyree v. [read post]
3 Nov 2014, 6:05 am
") SC19049 Concurrence - State v. [read post]
30 Oct 2014, 7:46 am
The court relied on the Supreme Court’s decision in Cleveland v. [read post]
22 Oct 2014, 11:53 am
United States v. [read post]
20 Oct 2014, 7:51 am
United States), and whether it is unconstitutional for a state court to exclude an accused individual and defense lawyers from a hearing to examine the legality of prosecutors’ exclusion of minority jurors from serving (Chappell v. [read post]
15 Oct 2014, 11:52 am
In Aycock v. [read post]
14 Oct 2014, 9:01 pm
The case, Ohio v. [read post]
13 Oct 2014, 4:28 am
`This requirement is satisfied if sufficient proof has been introduced so that a reasonable juror could find in favor of authenticity or identification. [read post]
9 Oct 2014, 8:46 am
After being questioned by the trial court about using peremptory challenges to strike minority jurors, the court granted the prosecutor’s request to provide his reasons ex parte to avoid divulging matters of trial strategy. [read post]
5 Oct 2014, 1:29 pm
WAYNE VENTLING v. [read post]
22 Sep 2014, 7:04 am
Berwick v. [read post]
16 Sep 2014, 7:10 am
At CitiesSpeak, Lisa Soronen compiles a list of eight petitions on the Court’s certiorari docket that either involve or could affect local governments. [read post]
10 Sep 2014, 11:48 am
The case is Fox News Network, LLC v. [read post]
3 Sep 2014, 12:11 am
The 2013 Act removed libel and slander from the list, so there is now a statutory presumption that there will be no jury unless a court orders otherwise. [read post]
