Search for: "Long v. Arnold" Results 501 - 520 of 564
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Aug 2021, 3:21 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Arnold Plant said the case for monopoly can’t be justified on the basis that the profits of monopoly will go to desireable things. [read post]
29 Dec 2017, 7:34 am by Ben
In the UK in FAPL v BT [2017] Mr Justice Arnold concluded that the High Court has the jurisdiction to make an order against an access provider that would require the ISP to block access not to a website but rather streaming servers giving unauthorised access to copyright content - 'live' blocking. [read post]
4 May 2012, 3:13 am by Guest Blogger
And in a speech to the conservative Federalist Society, Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell described the Republicans’ two pronged strategy: seeking repeal of the health care law in Congress while simultaneously attacking it in the courts.To be sure, the increasing divergence in the political philosophies of the Republican and Democratic Parties may go a long way toward explaining the homogeneity of the opposing camps in the litigation. [read post]
23 Nov 2010, 9:40 am
You’re Not Alone - http://tinyurl.com/2327c72 (Radhika Marya) Google Signs Data Agreement with UK Regulators - http://tinyurl.com/2fh2v2u (Lora Bentley) Long Live the Web: A Call for Continued Open Standards and Neutrality - http://tinyurl.com/389rc2x (Tim Berners-Lee) Microsoft Supporting Cloud Open Source Code For Hyper-V - http://tinyurl.com/323fudy (Charles Babcock) NIST Provides Guidelines for Securely Deploying IPv6 - http://tinyurl.com/28tcvkn (John Storts) Standards… [read post]
1 Nov 2009, 7:00 pm
Shusta, the court stated that even participants in an informal “kick the can” game owed no additional duty to each other than to refrain from intentional or willful and wanton misconduct. [19]             Some courts have broadened the scope of liability for sports participants by imposing a duty of care for unforeseeable risks which players would clearly not endorse given the… [read post]
21 Sep 2020, 2:00 pm by Amy Howe
Casey, the 1992 decision reaffirming Roe v. [read post]
2 Dec 2010, 9:16 am by Roshonda Scipio
. : Bloomsbury Press, 2010.Civil RightsKF4155 .S77 2010Mendez v. [read post]
27 Sep 2010, 3:34 am by Guest Blogger
(B) Consider a second example of a constitutional stupidity: The Guvernator, Arnold Schwarzenegger, cannot be president of the United States because of the Constitution. [read post]
25 Oct 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
              The debate in many ways goes back to Justice Holmes’s typically cryptic dissenting opinion in Lochner v. [read post]
24 Feb 2009, 8:10 am
As the amici curiae brief explains, this argument is contrary to the long-standing principles under which state law governs companies’ internal affairs and determines how they exercise their powers. [read post]
8 Apr 2024, 10:08 am by admin
The absence of supportive epidemiology was excused with hand waving that there was a “credible” mechanism, and that epidemiology took too long and was too expensive. [read post]