Search for: "Long v. Hooks"
Results 501 - 520
of 756
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Aug 2010, 4:31 pm
s Davis v. [read post]
16 May 2012, 3:52 am
Some major cases like ProCD v. [read post]
8 Jan 2012, 1:52 pm
" Elliott v. [read post]
23 Mar 2011, 2:11 pm
Presumably, such efforts would not be unwelcome and are probably long overdue.A brief glance at the amended Chet Baker Estate statement of claim (there is apparently no statement of defence) suggests the possibility of the following potential issues of interest to the various potential class members and, indeed, the general public in terms of overall copyright law and policy (assuming that the allegations are well founded, which has not been admitted or proven):• The… [read post]
3 Aug 2021, 2:22 pm
York & York v. [read post]
21 Jan 2022, 12:30 pm
In 1957, in Lambert v. [read post]
13 Feb 2020, 2:32 pm
Without safeguards, Wall Street will get its hooks in. [read post]
6 Jan 2011, 9:49 am
Grand Upright Music, Ltd v. [read post]
13 Apr 2018, 8:58 am
INS v. [read post]
6 Feb 2017, 8:00 am
U.S. v. [read post]
23 Mar 2012, 5:31 am
What was the hook the State used to get the case accepted? [read post]
1 Jul 2010, 7:34 am
United States v. [read post]
19 Jan 2016, 7:56 am
(Hague v. [read post]
19 Sep 2011, 5:24 am
Pure Power Boot Camp, Inc. v. [read post]
11 Nov 2018, 9:50 am
(McKenna, 104-105) (quoting Rolex Watch U.S.A. v. [read post]
7 Apr 2014, 8:15 am
Manson, Graham v. [read post]
30 Dec 2024, 11:52 am
Social collectives have long aspired to an age where they "beat their swords into plowshares, and their spears into pruning hooks" and where "nations shall not learn war anymore" (Isaiah 2:4); modernity has taught these collectives that it is still possible to kill persons with plowshares and to main others with pruning hooks changing the way one can engage in combat without without waging war.Pix credit hereOn Sept. 17, after Israel and the terrorist… [read post]
24 Mar 2012, 2:59 pm
He can say, “I heard V threaten to kill me, saw him reaching for his waistband, and was sure that he was going to shoot me”; and unless the jury concludes beyond a reasonable doubt that D — again, the only witness — is lying, D will be off the hook, even if D was well aware that V was no threat at all and just wanted to kill him. [read post]
12 Mar 2021, 8:42 am
Likewise, Hurley v. [read post]
14 Dec 2011, 4:05 am
This same battle was already fought, and lost, back in the 1980s with Smith v. [read post]
