Search for: "M/V Lord"
Results 501 - 520
of 915
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 May 2012, 6:42 am
Oracle America Inc (formerly Sun Microsystems Inc) v M-Tech Data Ltd, heard 30 April – 1 May 2012. [read post]
21 May 2012, 1:18 am
Housing and human rights The M v London Borough of Croydon case, decided last week, involved the important issue of costs in settled judicial reviews for s. 204 Housing Act 1996 Homeless appeals. [read post]
15 May 2012, 2:02 pm
The principles in R (M) v Slough Borough Council [2008] UKHL 52 should be applied, both as to the threshold for s.21(1)(a), met “as soon as a person can be said to be in need of some care and attention, even to a relatively small degree” [Lord Neuberger in M] and considering current and prospective need: Having regard to the principles set out in M in relation to current and prospective need (at [35], [55]), it will be a question of… [read post]
15 May 2012, 1:04 am
Following on Bahta & Ors, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department & Ors [2011] EWCA Civ 895 [Our report] and Lord Jackson’s view on JR costs, the Court of Appeal in M v London Borough of Croydon [2012] EWCA Civ 595 has given general guidance for awarding costs. [read post]
15 May 2012, 1:04 am
Following on Bahta & Ors, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department & Ors [2011] EWCA Civ 895 [Our report] and Lord Jackson’s view on JR costs, the Court of Appeal in M v London Borough of Croydon [2012] EWCA Civ 595 has given general guidance for awarding costs. [read post]
14 May 2012, 2:25 am
Oracle America Inc (formerly Sun Microsystems Inc) v M-Tech Data Ltd, heard 30 April – 1 May 2012. [read post]
13 May 2012, 2:02 pm
She considers such cases as Hatton v United Kingdom, Lopez Ostra v. [read post]
12 May 2012, 5:15 am
The principles in R (M) v Slough Borough Council [2008] UKHL 52 should be applied, both as to the threshold for s.21(1)(a), met "as soon as a person can be said to be in need of some care and attention, even to a relatively small degree" [Lord Neuberger in M] and considering current and prospective need: Having regard to the principles set out in M in relation to current and prospective need (at [35], [55]), it will be a question of fact in each… [read post]
12 May 2012, 5:15 am
The principles in R (M) v Slough Borough Council [2008] UKHL 52 should be applied, both as to the threshold for s.21(1)(a), met "as soon as a person can be said to be in need of some care and attention, even to a relatively small degree" [Lord Neuberger in M] and considering current and prospective need: Having regard to the principles set out in M in relation to current and prospective need (at [35], [55]), it will be a question of fact in each… [read post]
11 May 2012, 7:18 am
King (Annex KF 228 .K36 K56 2006) Flagrant Conduct: The Story of Lawrence v. [read post]
8 May 2012, 3:58 am
Oracle America Inc (formerly Sun Microsystems Inc) v M-Tech Data Ltd, heard 30 April – 1 May 2012. [read post]
7 May 2012, 3:05 am
M. [read post]
30 Apr 2012, 10:45 pm
V. [read post]
30 Apr 2012, 4:25 am
Starting today in the Supreme Court is the two day appeal of Oracle America Inc (formerly Sun Microsystems Inc) v M-Tech Data Ltd, listed to be heard by Lords Walker, Clarke, Sumption, Reed, and Carnwath. [read post]
23 Apr 2012, 3:04 am
Just in time for Murdoch’s visit, Tom Watson MP has released his new book, co-written with journalist Martin Hickman, Dial M for Murdoch. [read post]
20 Apr 2012, 4:00 am
For instance, while the political implications of e.g., the M v Germany judgment were recognised in Germany, there was never any question that it would not be implemented. [read post]
17 Apr 2012, 2:59 am
’ Lord Bingham, DPP v Collins (here). [read post]
16 Apr 2012, 6:01 am
(I’m not sure this is true, as a property teacher who recently taught State v. [read post]
16 Apr 2012, 3:11 am
. : Ontario Bar Association, 2012 1 v. [read post]
9 Apr 2012, 3:15 am
Leiter, Roy M. [read post]
