Search for: "MARK NEILS" Results 501 - 520 of 1,828
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Apr 2019, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
Or BassokIn a recent post, Neil Siegel describes a “major concern expressed during the partisan gerrymandering litigation before the Supreme Court over the past two terms”— “that the Court’s public legitimacy may suffer if it holds that federal courts may adjudicate the merits of political gerrymandering claims. [read post]
16 Apr 2019, 4:03 pm by Megan Carpenter
Problems with the statute’s language and application over time were raised by Justices Brett Kavanaugh, Neil Gorsuch and Ruth Bader Ginsburg. [read post]
16 Apr 2019, 4:30 am by David Oscar Markus
The examining attorney rejected Brunetti’s trademark application on the basis that the mark is a phonetic equivalent of a vulgar word. [read post]
15 Apr 2019, 1:44 pm by Mark Walsh
Justice Neil Gorsuch refers to the appendix at the end of Brunetti’s merits brief, which provides a four-page guide to those inconsistencies with examples that would make any sailor blush. [read post]
13 Apr 2019, 12:25 pm
Lessons to learn | Forfeiture of a trade mark as part a criminal convi [read post]
9 Apr 2019, 6:00 am by Sean Williamson (Toronto)
The author would like to thank Neil Rosen, articling student, for his assistance in preparing this legal update. [read post]
4 Apr 2019, 6:00 am by Guest Blogger
This development is obvious in the case of Justices Antonin Scalia, Clarence Thomas, and Neil Gorsuch. [read post]
3 Apr 2019, 10:08 am by Adam Feldman
Going even further, Slate’s Mark Joseph Stern referred to the decision as “beyond appalling,” while Think Progress’ Ian Millhiser described it as “the most bloodthirsty and cruel death penalty opinion of the modern era. [read post]
1 Apr 2019, 7:04 pm by Howard Bashman
And in commentary, online at Slate, Mark Joseph Stern has a jurisprudence essay titled “The Supreme Court’s Conservatives Just Legalized Torture; In an appalling death penalty opinion, Justice Neil Gorsuch just overturned 60 years of precedent. [read post]
1 Apr 2019, 3:54 am by Edith Roberts
” For the ABA Journal, Mark Walsh previews Department of Commerce v. [read post]
31 Mar 2019, 12:37 pm by Howard Bashman
And today at that blog, Neil Siegel has a post titled “In Defense of the Chief Justice’s Execution of His Responsibilities in NFIB v. [read post]
29 Mar 2019, 4:10 am by Edith Roberts
At Bloomberg, Greg Stohr reports that “[[t]he order marked an abrupt shift for the court, which last month voted 5-4 to let Alabama execute a Muslim man without his imam. [read post]
27 Mar 2019, 11:33 am
The 217thedition of Never Too Late is here now.CopyrightFollowing on from Kat Elenora Rosati’s delicious dissection of the CJEU decision in Levola Hengola v Smilde Foods, Neil Wilkoff writes about some further thoughts on the case. [read post]
21 Mar 2019, 4:12 am by Edith Roberts
Mark Walsh has a first-hand look at yesterday’s argument in Flowers v. [read post]
20 Mar 2019, 3:53 am by Edith Roberts
” Briefly: Mark Walsh analyzes yesterday’s oral argument in Cochise Consultancy v. [read post]
14 Mar 2019, 9:01 pm by Jim Sedor
Neil Bush solicited a $1.3 million contribution from American Pacific International Capital (APIC), an international investment holding company where he is a board member. [read post]
8 Mar 2019, 6:04 am by Jim Sedor
Atkinson’s resignation marks the first time a lawmaker has left mid-session since 2013. [read post]
6 Mar 2019, 4:04 am by Edith Roberts
” At Slate, Mark Joseph Stern argues that “Kavanaugh may have shied away from the case [because] Morris County’s program flagrantly favored churches, rendering most businesses and nonprofits ineligible for historic preservation funds. [read post]