Search for: "MARKS v. STATE" Results 501 - 520 of 21,493
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Jun 2020, 6:57 am by Lisa Larrimore Ouellette
Guest post by Jake Linford, Loula Fuller and Dan Myers Professor, Florida State University College of Law, whose trademark law scholarship I have highlighted on JotwellI want to thank Lisa Ouellette for inviting me to blog about United States Patent & Trademark Office v. [read post]
16 Mar 2007, 4:40 am
State, to fit within the category of an illegal sentence, the illegality must inhere in the sentence itself, i.e., there either has been no convinction warranting any sentence or the sentence is not a permitted one for the conviction upon which it was imposed and, for either reason, is intrinsically and substantially unlawful. [read post]
29 Oct 2012, 10:37 am
234/06 P Il Ponte Finanziaria v OHIM -- and here it is again. [read post]
13 Jun 2017, 9:32 pm by Helen Macpherson
Section 27(1)(a) states that a trade mark application must be in the name of a person who “claims to be the owner of the trade mark”. [read post]
13 Jun 2017, 9:32 pm by Helen Macpherson
Section 27(1)(a) states that a trade mark application must be in the name of a person who “claims to be the owner of the trade mark”. [read post]
24 Jun 2014, 8:08 am
The GC found to be equally irrelevant the circumstance that K-Swiss managed to have the five stripes registered as trade mark in eight Member States. [read post]
27 Jun 2018, 1:50 pm by Jon Levitan
This morning the court issued a 5-4 opinion in Janus v. [read post]
28 Jun 2011, 6:06 am by Katie Koch
A common misconception shared by many of our clients is that in order to have a trademark they must have a registration with the United States Patent and Trademark Office. [read post]
17 May 2012, 9:28 am by David Gans
Today marks the 58th anniversary of the Supreme Court’s landmark decision in Brown v. [read post]
17 Jun 2012, 7:10 pm by Barry Eagar
One or more words that might reasonably be required by a competitor to describe similar goods/service cannot be such a badge.I'm going to be lazy here and simply paste in the relevant section of Clark Equipment Co v Registrar of Trade Marks [(1964) 111 CLR 51, in which Kitto J said:"In Registrar of Trade Marks v W. and G. [read post]