Search for: "MATTER OF B D C" Results 501 - 520 of 8,659
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Feb 2021, 2:30 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Marks are getting longer over time b/c more is taken. [read post]
4 Jun 2018, 9:39 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  Porco: movie about a young man who killed his father/tried to kill his mother—sued b/c they used his real name and argued that he had a claim b/c it was substantially fictionalized. [read post]
30 Mar 2010, 11:21 pm by admin@lawiscoool.com (Omar Ha-Redeye)
A Primer on Freedom Let’s begin our discussion with a review of the Ann Coulter affair, which bears some analogues to the Québéc niqab issue. [read post]
1 Jul 2020, 11:13 am by Chuck Rosenberg
When Companies A and B propose a merger and are investigated, despite market factors that should not normally trigger Antitrust Division review, what do Companies C and D see, think and do? [read post]
6 Nov 2011, 5:01 pm by Oliver G. Randl
The ED was of the opinion that the subject-matter of claim 1 contained surgical steps and as such was excluded from patentability.Claim 1 of the main request before the Board read (in English translation):Method for determining the change or change in length of a first object (b) which is connected in an initial state to a second object (d) via a joint (k) and which has been changed after having been detached from the second object (d), wherein a reference system… [read post]
9 Apr 2016, 2:55 am
The Board drew a distinction between 7(1)(c) and 7(1)(d). [read post]
2 Oct 2020, 12:17 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
As a quantitative matter, what was copied was a rounding error. [read post]
2 Jan 2013, 5:01 pm by oliver randl
This follows from the petition itself […], and from the passage of the decision explaining the argument concerning points C and D […]. [read post]
11 Aug 2013, 1:28 pm
Indeed, Section 812.014(2)(c) provides that theft of any property not specified in section 812.014(2)(a) or (b), is petit theft and a misdemeanor of the second degree. [read post]
31 Oct 2015, 4:29 pm
”In contrast section 8 of the Representation Agreement Act provides:Test of incapability for standard provisions8  (1) An adult may make a representation agreement consisting of one or more of the standard provisions authorized by section 7 even though the adult is incapable of(a) making a contract,(b) managing his or her health care, personal care or legal matters, or(c) the routine management of his or her financial affairs.(2) In deciding whether an… [read post]
10 Jan 2013, 5:01 pm by oliver randl
Figure 2, vector “HVB(SL3NEO)”, and page 16; for features (a) to (c) cf. [read post]
31 Mar 2017, 9:08 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Still get broader scope in TM no matter what b/c of infringement standard. [read post]
6 Jun 2009, 4:36 am
The replies to the questionnaire and the subsequent discussions held within the Committee on Civil Law Matters consequently focused specifically on (a) the fundamental principles to be adopted, (b) the definitions which should be included and (c) the model rules to be provided for. [read post]
4 Jan 2012, 3:38 am by Russ Bensing
  He was convicted of stealing $11,000 from his grandmother, based on the fact that (A) he knew where grandma kept the money, and had a key to her house, (B) there was no sign of break-in when the grandmother found money missing, (C) shortly after the money went missing, Ingram opened an account with a deposit of $9,900, despite (D) never having held a job, as best anyone can figure. [read post]
5 Mar 2016, 11:33 am
The CJEU essentially answered that these matters had no relevance to the question at hand. [read post]