Search for: "MATTER OF H D"
Results 501 - 520
of 3,840
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 May 2022, 9:20 am
In the case of video standards such as AVC/H.264 the vast majority of SEPs are monetized through patent pooling. [read post]
26 May 2022, 10:49 am
Why would it matter that it doesn't take a life? [read post]
25 May 2022, 9:09 am
This opinion gives the Supreme Court another reason to intervene in the Texas case on the shadow docket; or if the Supreme Court defers the matter, the opinion sets up a likely circuit split that can support granting certiorari. [read post]
23 May 2022, 6:54 am
Ellen is a professor in sports media, in the Roy H. [read post]
23 May 2022, 5:13 am
Background: Description amendmentsThe current EPO Guidelines for Examination require applicants to amend the description of a European patent application in line with the scope of the allowable claims (H-V, 2.7 and F-IV, 4.3(iii)). [read post]
20 May 2022, 2:44 pm
”“Later in the day, Circuit Judge Laurence H. [read post]
16 May 2022, 7:30 am
After all, in the words of Thomas H. [read post]
11 May 2022, 4:00 am
However, "the fundamental duty" of defendant's office is "to 'superintend the fiscal concerns of the state'" (Matter of Martin H. [read post]
11 May 2022, 4:00 am
However, "the fundamental duty" of defendant's office is "to 'superintend the fiscal concerns of the state'" (Matter of Martin H. [read post]
11 May 2022, 4:00 am
However, "the fundamental duty" of defendant's office is "to 'superintend the fiscal concerns of the state'" (Matter of Martin H. [read post]
11 May 2022, 4:00 am
However, "the fundamental duty" of defendant's office is "to 'superintend the fiscal concerns of the state'" (Matter of Martin H. [read post]
9 May 2022, 7:29 am
This guest post was written by Frank Hülsberg, who is a Chartered Accountant and Tax Advisor in Düsseldorf, Partner Advisory and Member of the Executive Board at Grant Thornton AG Wirtschaftsprüfungsgesellschaft in Germany, and Burkhard Fassbach, a D&O-lawyer in private practice in Germany. [read post]
6 May 2022, 6:10 am
This is not simply a matter of the—already controversial[32]—historical attempts by the agency to define under Section 5 conduct that goes outside the Sherman Act. [read post]
3 May 2022, 8:57 am
His analysis resembles the late Justice Scalia’s in a case called Michael H. v. [read post]
3 May 2022, 8:00 am
Robert D. [read post]
29 Apr 2022, 5:01 am
I'd love to hear any suggestions people might have; I still have a few weeks to edit it before it's put to bed. [read post]
27 Apr 2022, 7:28 am
What the legislature ‘would have wanted’ it did not provide, and that is the end of the matter. [read post]
27 Apr 2022, 6:10 am
However, “[h]ow consumers first learned about [defendant’s product] ... does not matter if they nonetheless decided to purchase the product only for its purported health benefits. [read post]
21 Apr 2022, 7:30 am
In the first few months of any early nineteenth-century Congress – or, for that matter, most any state legislative session — weeks if not months would be taken up with reading of petitions (McKinley 2018; Blackhawk et al 2020). [read post]
21 Apr 2022, 4:00 am
Makepeace Foreword: Justice David H. [read post]