Search for: "MATTER OF K B" Results 501 - 520 of 2,717
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Aug 2012, 5:01 pm by oliver
As a matter of fact, the existing interests (Interessenlage) are the same. [read post]
2 Aug 2012, 5:01 pm by oliver
Well, it has finally reached K’s law, too.The Opposition Division had revoked the patent. [read post]
10 Jan 2010, 3:02 pm by Armand Grinstajn
The same conclusion applies to current claims 1 to 3 according to the current sole request on file, the subject-matter of which partly overlaps with the subject-matter of the claims granted in relation with the parent application. [read post]
30 Aug 2011, 5:01 pm by Oliver G. Randl
Thus, the “disclosure status” of subject-matter individualised from lists has to be determined according to the circumstances of each specific case by ultimately answering the question whether or not the skilled person would clearly and unambiguously derive the subject-matter at issue from the document as a whole […].In the present decision, Board 3.3.02 comments this approach.The patent proprietor had filed an appeal after the Opposition Division had revoked the… [read post]
4 Nov 2010, 4:01 pm by Oliver G. Randl
In particular the board has examined whether the subject-matter of claims 11 and 12 has a technical character because the claimed program, when run on a computer, causes a “further technical effect” (see T 1173/97 [9.4]). [read post]
4 Sep 2012, 5:01 pm by oliver
The Board notes further the undisputed fact that substantially all conceivable embodiments of the display pack defined in the granted claims 5 to 7 (which are formally not dependent from claim 1) appear also to be subject-matter of claim 1 as granted. [read post]
21 Jan 2015, 1:16 pm by Joel O'Malley
Answer: By:  Jessica Linehan, Joel O’Malley, and Brian Rosenau A recent Seventh Circuit decision provides a cautionary tale for employers deciding what level of detail about litigated matters to include in publicly disclosed Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) filings. [read post]
25 Sep 2013, 5:01 pm by oliver randl
In particular, since the amendments involve a substantial shift of the subject-matter of the independent claim, other documents dealing with the administration of air under pressure into the interior of a patient’s eye might have to be analysed in more detail.Should you wish to download the whole decision, just click here.The file wrapper can be found here.NB: This decision has also been discussed and commented on Le blog du droit européen des brevets (here). [read post]
17 Nov 2012, 11:01 am by oliver randl
According to G 1/03, “an anticipation is accidental if it is so unrelated to and remote from the claimed invention that the person skilled in the art would never have taken it into consideration when making the invention”.[22] For a given claim, a disclaimer can only be allowed if it excludes the entire subject-matter that has been disclosed accidentally. [read post]
6 Nov 2010, 12:00 pm by Oliver G. Randl
In this opinion it was held inter alia that the subject-matter of claim 1 did not involve an inventive step […]. b) In its reply dated 18.09.2008 the appellant filed amended application documents. [read post]
1 Feb 2010, 1:52 pm by Page Perry LLC
Anyone who holds a variable annuity in a tax-deferred account, such as an IRA, 401(k), or 403(b) plan, should consider that fact a red flag that warrants consultation with an attorney with experience in securities matters. [read post]
1 Jan 2012, 11:42 am
(B) Request its managing agent or other agents or staff to report back to the board of directors at a subsequent meeting concerning any matter, or take action to direct its managing agent or other agents or staff to place a matter of business on a future agenda. [read post]
7 Jan 2007, 9:25 am
No lobbyist makes any money by saying "no matter what we do, things will stay pretty much the same. [read post]
23 Jan 2011, 3:01 pm by Oliver G. Randl
Nor can it be amended by deleting such limiting subject-matter from the claims, because such amendment would extend the protection conferred, which is prohibited by A 123(3). [read post]