Search for: "MATTER OF POWERS v. Powers" Results 501 - 520 of 21,570
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Jan 2010, 12:47 pm by Patrick
for this question: Why would a law professor oppose a Supreme Court decision on a matter of constitutional law and not respect the authority of the Court and honor our system of separation of powers? [read post]
29 Jan 2022, 9:15 am by William Morriss
However, current subject matter eligibility jurisprudence provides tools to simply treat content-based inventions as ineligible (e.g., Electric Power Group, LLC v. [read post]
30 May 2011, 6:00 am by Adam Wagner
As to Scottish power to administer its own criminal justice system, this may be a case where the solution is worse than the problem. [read post]
1 Oct 2008, 10:52 am
LG was a good decision as a matter of law. [read post]
10 Jun 2016, 8:28 am by Rory Little
Other than perhaps the Court’s first use of “T-boned” to describe an automobile accident, there was little remarkable in yesterday’s six-to-two decision in Dietz v. [read post]
14 Nov 2014, 3:43 am
Jack Goldsmith, Martin Lederman and several others have suggested that the Supreme Court could avoid difficult constitutional decisions about the separation of powers in foreign relations in Zivotofsky v. [read post]
19 Jun 2019, 2:36 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
 As  the case for relief was not made out in the present case, the Court  concluded it was undesirable to make a definitive pronouncement on this matter. [read post]
3 May 2012, 8:58 pm by Jonathan H. Adler
Rev. 1867, 1868 (2005), and, doing so, clarify (indeed curtail) the contours of federal power to enact laws that intrude on matters so local that no drafter of the Convention contemplated their inclusion in it. [read post]
8 Aug 2018, 10:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
" Citing Matter of McComb v Reasoner, 29 AD3d 795, the Appellate Division noted that the Court of Appeals has interpreted Civil Service Law §72(2)  to "require[ ] that the power to discipline be delegated, if necessary, within the governmental department's chain of command" and that the Court of Appeals has further interpreted Civil Service Law §72(2) to:1. require that the power to discipline be delegated, if necessary, within… [read post]
30 Aug 2021, 5:51 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
The continuous representation doctrine tolls the limitations period “where there is a mutual understanding of the need for further representation on the specific subject matter underlying the malpractice claim” (McCoy, 99 NY2d at 306), and ” ‘where the continuing representation pertains specifically to [that] matter’ ” (International Electron Devices [USA] LLC v Menter, Rudin & Trivelpiece, P.C., 71 AD3d 1512, 1513 [4th Dept 2010],… [read post]