Search for: "MATTER OF R T" Results 501 - 520 of 53,770
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Mar 2009, 6:33 pm
INDEED: “I don't intend to cease exercising my First Amendment right to speak about matters of legitimate public concern because some lawyer who is mis[re]presenting the content of my post threatens a bogus complaint to my State Bar. [read post]
10 Oct 2018, 1:48 pm by Duets Guest Blogger
The post Meaning testing matters, a lot. appeared first on DuetsBlog. [read post]
12 May 2012, 5:26 am by Ray Mullman
The series, Family Matters, will continue in installments each Tuesday into June. [read post]
27 Aug 2012, 5:01 pm by oliver
It should not be left up to the party concerned and a board to construct the applicable reasons (see for instance T 1709/06 and T 1309/05). [read post]
3 Mar 2015, 4:12 pm by Katie Porter
Who your servicer is really does matter. [read post]
24 Feb 2010, 3:02 pm by Oliver G. Randl
A number of decisions of the EPO Boards of Appeal have pointed out however that a decision form which refers to several communications, leaving it to the board of appeal and the appellant to speculate as to which of the reasons given by the ED in its communications might be essential to the decision to refuse the application does not meet the ‘reasoned’ requirement of R 68(2) EPC 1973 (see T 861/02, T 897/03, T 276/04 and T 1309/05). [4]In its… [read post]
1 Dec 2015, 4:00 am by Cordell Parvin
In other words, your image matters. [read post]
7 Apr 2013, 9:09 pm by Patent Docs
-- panel includes Patent Docs author Kevin Noonan • Afternoon Keynote Speaker -- James T. [read post]
5 May 2009, 8:58 am by Marshall Isaacs
I don’t have to be on the first page of Google or the fifteenth, for that matter. [read post]
31 Oct 2019, 11:26 am by David M. Ward
You’ll never get it all done, no matter how hard you try. [read post]
11 Jan 2008, 12:55 am
District Judge Henry Kennedy Jr. won't be prying into the CIA's destruction of interrogation tapes in 2005. [read post]
1 Jul 2012, 5:01 pm by Oliver
Therefore, the Board concludes that the appeal complies with the requirements of A 108 and R 99(2) and is admissible. [read post]
6 Mar 2019, 12:24 pm by Roel van Woudenberg
Nevertheless, it tended to the view that the simulation method underlying claim 1 of each request did not contribute to the technical character of the invention and that the subject-matter of claim 1 of each request lacked inventive step.V. [read post]
16 Aug 2022, 1:12 am by Rose Hughes
On appeal, the applicant amended the claims to subject matter that the Examining Division had previously indicated as being novel. [read post]