Search for: "MICHAEL SHAPIRO" Results 501 - 520 of 686
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 May 2024, 3:00 am by jonathanturley
Shapiro Professor of Public Interest Law at the George Washington University Law School. [read post]
25 Jul 2008, 7:04 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: CAFC affirms validity and enforceability of Eisai’s compound patent on Aciphex; elucidates current standard for obviousness of chemical composition of matter patents: Eisai v Reddy’s Lab’s and Teva Pharma: (Orange Book Blog), (Patent Docs), (Patent Prospector), (IP Law360), (Hal Wegner), (Patent Baristas), Three-strikes scheme… [read post]
9 Jan 2012, 6:46 am by Joshua Matz
  Michael Doyle of the Sacramento Bee profiles Damien Schiff, who will argue on behalf of the Sacketts. [read post]
2 Jul 2020, 9:05 pm by Joshua Burd
McGarity, Michael C. [read post]
25 May 2019, 11:00 am by Race to the Bottom
One noteworthy economist, University of California at Berkeley Professor Carl Shapiro, testified on behalf of the DOJ during the failed attempt to block the purchase of Time Warner Inc. by AT&T. [read post]
19 Oct 2011, 11:27 am by Dennis Crouch
" VERIZON & HP (Michael Kellogg, Kellogg Huber): "It is longstanding law that a claim is non-patentable if it recites a prior art process and adds only the mental recognition of a newly discovered property of that process. [read post]
19 Aug 2021, 9:08 pm by Omar Khodor
EPA Administrator Michael S. [read post]
18 Oct 2017, 4:30 am by Michael J. Glennon
Hathaway and Shapiro do not. [read post]
1 Mar 2013, 1:27 pm by Rahul Bhagnari, ACLU
A recent report by James Austin and Michael Jacobson demonstrates that decisions made at the local level can have a dramatic effect on state prison populations. [read post]
30 Jul 2019, 1:57 pm by Arshan Barzani
He similarly argues that “real start” of the debate on the prohibition of aggression was at the Paris Peace Conference—rather than through the Kellogg–Briand Pact, as Oona Hathaway and Scott Shapiro argue in “The Internationalists: How a Radical Plan to Outlaw War Remade the World” (reviewed at Lawfare by Michael Glennon). [read post]
14 Nov 2018, 4:07 pm by Ilya Somin
Professor Michael Paulsen, a noted national scholar and Originalist, believes that originalism must be exercised with strong deference to the decisions of non-judicial political actors.... [read post]
10 Jun 2016, 9:40 am by Lisa Ouellette
Michael Meurer, Shared Patent Damages – If ex ante contracting between potential patent defendants occurs, whether damages can be apportioned between a buyer and seller doesn't affect innovation incentives. [read post]
25 Apr 2018, 9:05 am by Ilya Somin
Ilya Shapiro of the Cato Institute thinks Chief Justice Roberts might find some way to get rid of the case on "technical" grounds that obviate the need to address the merits. [read post]
14 Nov 2018, 4:07 pm by Ilya Somin
Professor Michael Paulsen, a noted national scholar and Originalist, believes that originalism must be exercised with strong deference to the decisions of non-judicial political actors.... [read post]
24 Jan 2011, 1:00 pm by Lucas A. Ferrara, Esq.
Miller, Eastern ConsolidatedAlan Friedman, CBREAvi Rosen, Carnegie Hill PropertiesGary Higbee, Steel Institute of New YorkGeorgia Malone, Georgia Malone & Company, Inc.Rubin Isak, Falco & Isak Investment RealtyAlex Isak, Falco & Isak Investment RealtyHarold Friedman, Nat'l Elevator Cab & Door Corp.Ingrid Horowitz, National Elevator Cab&Door Corp.Abe Spira, madison realty capitalWayne Baird, First American Title Insurance CompanyDaniel Hollander, L&L RESIDENTIAL, LLCLee… [read post]
25 Dec 2012, 9:30 pm by RegBlog
      “Appreciating the Politics Inside Benefit-Cost Analysis”by Stuart Shapiro, Rutgers University, and John Morrall, Mercatus Center (April 2)   Why do some regulations deliver greater value to society than others? [read post]
15 Jun 2011, 9:26 pm by Will Aitchison
Wal-Mart’s efforts at showing lack of commonality generally go to the weight of Plaintiffs’ evidence, such as challenges to Shapiro’s statistical analysis, rather than its admissibility. [read post]