Search for: "Mann v. Mann" Results 501 - 520 of 1,399
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Oct 2016, 4:45 am by INFORRM
  It is not yet clear whether the third related case – MGN’s appeal from the decision of Mann J in 8 Representative Claimants v MGN Ltd ([2016] EWHC 855 (Ch)) – will be heard at the same time. [read post]
10 Jun 2015, 7:30 am by Emma Lewis, Olswang LLP
They gave three reasons for their conclusion: No misuse of power Eclairs and Glengary sought to rely on the case of Howard Smith Ltd v Ampol Petroleum Ltd [1974] AC 821 where it was held that the board had used their power for an improper purpose. [read post]
4 Mar 2011, 2:30 pm by Luke Gilman
Find one in your neck of the woods http://ow.ly/44tjG # JW's Michelle Mann analyzes Pineda v. [read post]
30 Apr 2009, 2:44 am
The author assignors gave notice of material breach and Mann J (in the Chancery Division) upheld the automatic reversion of the copyright to them. [read post]
2 Mar 2010, 1:09 am by sally
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Olden v Serious Organised Crime Agency [2010] EWCA Civ 143 (26 February 2010) Mohamed, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for Foreign & Commonwealth Affairs (Rev 1) [2010] EWCA Civ 158 (26 February 2010) LG, R (on the application of) v Independent Appeal Panel for Tom Hood School & Ors [2010] EWCA Civ 142 (26 February 2010) Mann v Northern Electric Distribution Ltd [2010] EWCA Civ 141 (26 February… [read post]
1 Feb 2012, 6:18 am by INFORRM
On 17 November 2010, Mann J held that Mr Mulcaire was not entitled to rely on the PSI ([2010] EWHC 2952 (Ch)). [read post]
20 Nov 2018, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
In Golub v Enquirer/Star Group, 89 NY2d 1074, the court opined that "Generally, a written statement may be defamatory 'if it tends to expose a person to hatred, contempt or aversion, or to induce an evil or unsavory opinion of him in the minds of a substantial number of the community'", quoting Mencher v Chesley, 297 NY 94. [read post]
20 Nov 2018, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
In Golub v Enquirer/Star Group, 89 NY2d 1074, the court opined that "Generally, a written statement may be defamatory 'if it tends to expose a person to hatred, contempt or aversion, or to induce an evil or unsavory opinion of him in the minds of a substantial number of the community'", quoting Mencher v Chesley, 297 NY 94. [read post]
1 Dec 2014, 1:38 am by Ryan Dolby-Stevens, Olswang LLP
Appellate History The Prince appealed the five orders of Vos J, Norris J and Mann J (together the “Orders”) to the Court of Appeal, which unanimously refused the appeal (as to all of the Orders) on 31 July 2014 (HRH Prince Abdulaziz Bin Mishal Bin Abdulaziz Al Saud v Apex Global Management Ltd & Anor [2014] EWCA Civ 1106). [read post]
28 May 2015, 4:11 am by INFORRM
The damages awarded well exceeded those previously payable, as justified in the tour de force of a judgment by Mann J in Gulati v MGN ([2015] EWHC 1482 (Ch)). [read post]
29 Jul 2010, 7:04 am
  The appeal was allowed, resulting in the judgment of Mann J on finding the patent to be invalid being overturned. [read post]
4 Apr 2014, 11:04 am by Timothy Simeone
During Wednesday’s argument in Fifth Third Bancorp v. [read post]
25 Jul 2012, 10:04 am by Josh Wright
Adler, Bernard Petrie Professor of Law and Business and Associate Dean for Information Systems and Technology, New York University School of Law Panel V. [read post]
13 Jan 2014, 6:06 am by Amy Howe
Ronald Mann previews today’s second oral argument, in the bankruptcy case Law v. [read post]