Search for: "Mark S. Adams" Results 501 - 520 of 4,065
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Sep 2016, 10:25 pm by Bill Marler
It is marked by easy bruising, pallor, and decreased urine output. [read post]
9 May 2017, 4:44 am
"So the Civil War could have been avoided... if only the Revolution had been avoided.That's the theory contemplated by Adam Gopnik in "WE COULD HAVE BEEN CANADA/Was the American Revolution such a good idea? [read post]
8 Apr 2010, 4:30 am by Gritsforbreakfast
The portion of the hearing pertaining to the Forensic Science Commission begins around the 1:36:00 mark. [read post]
24 Apr 2018, 7:12 pm by Howard Bashman
Mark Sherman of The Associated Press reports that “Supreme Court seems divided over Texas redistricting. [read post]
12 Apr 2019, 7:40 am by Darren Olivier
These examples exist against an international backdrop created by the dramatic Theranos demise, following revelations that its patented technology did not work.The research included a collaboration with the CEOs of governance group FluidRock - Ronelle Kleyn and Adv Annamarie Van Der Merwe, time spent with the helpful Institute of Directors in Southern Africa's new CEO - Parmi Natesan, a great read of the new book by Janice Denoncourt "Intellectual Property, Finance & Corporate… [read post]
23 Jun 2008, 2:21 am
Next year, those laws could become even stricter if legislators decide to implement the Adam Walsh Act. [read post]
17 May 2024, 4:35 pm by Howard Bashman
” Online at Slate, Dahlia Lithwick and Mark Joseph Stern have a Jurisprudence essay titled “The Smallest Justice Who Ever Lived; Samuel Alito’s explanations for his wife’s upside-down American flag make the story even worse. [read post]
21 Aug 2017, 5:46 am by Lindsey A. Zahn
Thus, the Board determined—in light of the above—there was a likelihood of confusion between Applicant’s mark and Registrant’s mark and thus refused the registration of Applicant’s mark under Section 2(d) of the Trademark Act. [read post]
21 Aug 2017, 5:46 am by Lindsey A. Zahn
Thus, the Board determined—in light of the above—there was a likelihood of confusion between Applicant’s mark and Registrant’s mark and thus refused the registration of Applicant’s mark under Section 2(d) of the Trademark Act. [read post]