Search for: "Mark v. Mark"
Results 501 - 520
of 34,448
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Aug 2022, 4:15 am
Brunetti was the respondent in the 2019 Supreme Court case, Iancu v. [read post]
18 May 2014, 9:04 pm
This stems from a Trademark Trial and Appeal Board decision in Crocker Bank v CIBC, 223 U.S.P.Q. 909 (T.T.A.B. 1984), the correctness of which is open to doubt. [read post]
31 Aug 2010, 10:24 pm
Brooks Brothers, Inc. v. [read post]
2 Jun 2017, 8:47 am
but also the creator of the content that the physical item conveys" (Dastar Corp v Twentieth Century Fox Film Corp, 539 US 23, at 33). [read post]
28 Jan 2011, 2:29 pm
Arnstein & Lehr Partners Mark A. [read post]
13 Feb 2010, 11:00 am
In a motion filed January 22, both the SEC and Mark Cuban jointly requested an extension to complete discovery and to submit supplemental briefing on Mr. [read post]
21 Sep 2010, 1:00 pm
In a ruling today, the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals reinstated the SEC's 2008 insider trading case against Mark Cuban. [read post]
15 Apr 2019, 11:44 pm
Retromark Volume V: the last six months in trade marks1. [read post]
25 Feb 2013, 3:37 pm
The IPKat craves your indulgence as he turns to Case T‑504/11 Paul Hartmann AG v OHIM, Protecsom SAS, a 4 February ruling of the First Chamber of the General Court of the European Union. [read post]
27 Jun 2024, 6:30 am
For the Balkinization Symposium on Mark A. [read post]
25 Feb 2011, 6:58 am
By the way, Judge Everingham issued an opinion this week as well transferring a false marking case in the Promote Innovation LLC v. [read post]
10 Jan 2021, 5:52 pm
Even if an infringement action succeeds, courts are too often reluctant to issue permanent injunctive relief, and meeting the eBay v. [read post]
14 Nov 2007, 5:20 am
[www.oranous.com][www.oranous.com]UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA ORLANDO DIVISION MARK DEAN SCHWAB, Plaintiff, v. [read post]
29 Sep 2011, 5:59 am
" GHJ Holdings, LLC v. [read post]
23 Jun 2010, 8:10 am
" Simonian v. [read post]
13 Nov 2019, 11:12 am
In Taylor v. [read post]
15 Feb 2012, 6:52 am
Sukumar v. [read post]
12 Oct 2012, 8:36 am
Mark Spognardi Jesse Dill Arnstein & Lehr Chicago Partner Mark A. [read post]
5 Jul 2007, 10:39 pm
This is an action for annulment brought by the owner of the national word mark TOSCA for perfumes against the Board of Appeal's dismissal of an appeal from the Opposition Division, which rejected its opposition against the application for registration of the word mark TOSKA for goods in Class 18* Confusingly similar but actually quite different is Case T-150/04 Mülhens v OHIM - Minoronzoni (TOSCA BLU). [read post]
