Search for: "Mark v. Social Security Administration"
Results 501 - 520
of 587
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Jul 2011, 9:23 am
Academic freedom -- United States ACADEMIC FREEDOM AND THE LAW: A COMPARATIVE STUDY / ERIC BARENDT Oxford; Portland, Or. : Hart Pub., 2010 K3755 .B37 2010 See Catalog Affirmative action programs -- Law and legislation -- United States AFFIRMATIVE ACTION IN ANTIDISCRIMINATION LAW AND POLICY / WILLIAM M. [read post]
13 Jul 2011, 11:49 am
Academic freedom -- United States ACADEMIC FREEDOM AND THE LAW: A COMPARATIVE STUDY / ERIC BARENDT Oxford; Portland, Or. : Hart Pub., 2010 K3755 .B37 2010 See Catalog Affirmative action programs -- Law and legislation -- United States AFFIRMATIVE ACTION IN ANTIDISCRIMINATION LAW AND POLICY / WILLIAM M. [read post]
28 Jun 2011, 1:26 pm
Nevertheless, same-sex couples in New York who marry will not be married under federal law -- a confusing situation when it comes to immigration, taxes, and federal benefits such as Social Security. [read post]
6 Jun 2011, 2:05 am
(quoting Social Security Ruling 85-28). [read post]
1 Jun 2011, 10:25 am
Just last week the Obama administration similarly urged the Supreme Court to refuse to hear arguments relating to Saleh v. [read post]
22 May 2011, 11:23 am
According to the Court, The Social Security Administration (SSA) Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) who rejected Ms. [read post]
21 May 2011, 1:53 pm
” Over time, these restrictions were removed – a trend most dramatically marked by the 1967 United States Supreme Court ruling in Loving v. [read post]
21 May 2011, 1:53 pm
” Over time, these restrictions were removed – a trend most dramatically marked by the 1967 United States Supreme Court ruling in Loving v. [read post]
11 Apr 2011, 5:16 am
Mark Lemley – Obama administration seems to be interested in directing ISPs to cut off parts of the internet they don’t like—an internet kill switch, which worked so well in Egypt. [read post]
7 Apr 2011, 6:00 am
Each count of Social Security fraud carries a maximum penalty of up to five years in prison and a $250,000 fine. [read post]
5 Apr 2011, 3:33 pm
Marks & Spencer. [read post]
1 Apr 2011, 2:42 pm
By Andrew Delaney Louko v. [read post]
25 Mar 2011, 4:56 am
If you plan to take advantage of the VITA program, the IRS encourages you to bring the following items with you to the site: Proof of identification Social Security Cards for you, your spouse and dependents and/or a Social Security Number verification letter issued by the Social Security Administration or Individual Taxpayer Identification Number (ITIN) assignment letter for you, your spouse and dependents Proof of Foreign status if… [read post]
23 Mar 2011, 6:00 am
” State v. [read post]
2 Mar 2011, 4:56 pm
Today, it's FCC v. [read post]
5 Feb 2011, 10:22 am
“If we make America the best place to do business, businesses should make their mark in America. [read post]
24 Jan 2011, 11:25 am
Problem In 1978, Congress enacted the Indian Child Welfare Act to address the “alarmingly high percentage of Indian families […] broken up by the removal, often unwarranted, of their children from them by nontribal public and private agencies and institutions,” as well as the fact “that the States, exercising their recognized jurisdiction over Indian child custody proceedings through administrative… [read post]
24 Jan 2011, 11:25 am
Problem In 1978, Congress enacted the Indian Child Welfare Act to address the “alarmingly high percentage of Indian families […] broken up by the removal, often unwarranted, of their children from them by nontribal public and private agencies and institutions,” as well as the fact “that the States, exercising their recognized jurisdiction over Indian child custody proceedings through administrative… [read post]
Mayo Foundation v. U.S.: Supreme Court Brushes Off Medical Residents, Unsettles Agency Deference Law
13 Jan 2011, 3:30 am
United States: Congress funds Social Security by taxing both employers and employees under FICA on the wages employees earn. ... [read post]
7 Jan 2011, 2:12 pm
In Rodriguez, the court upheld the criminal CFAA conviction of defendant Roberto Rodriguez, a former Social Security Administration (“SSA”) telephone service representative, because he accessed confidential and sensitive files for “a non-business reason. [read post]
