Search for: "Markes v. United States" Results 501 - 520 of 10,418
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Nov 2014, 10:03 am by Joel R. Brandes
In Smedley v Smedley, --- F.3d ----, 2014 WL 5647426 (C.A.4 (N.C.)) the Smedleys married in 2000 in Germany, where Mark was stationed as a member of the United States Army. [read post]
21 Jun 2018, 8:02 am by Overhauser Law Offices, LLC
Sykes in the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit and assigned case number 17-2252. [read post]
12 Aug 2013, 8:28 am by Jon
An amendment should specifically overturn Kohl v. [read post]
9 Feb 2010, 9:08 am by Matt Sundquist
  At the same time though, there will be a new “high-water mark” of criminal enforcement. [read post]
10 Mar 2023, 3:30 am
Long-standing precedent makes clear that Trademark Act Section 2(d) provides two separate bases for refusal, one being a mark registered in the USPTO and the other being a mark (or trade name) previously used in the United States and not abandoned, and that the requirement of priority of use applies only to unregistered marks asserted as a bar to registration. [read post]
13 Feb 2024, 10:02 am by Josh Blackman
On Monday, February 12, 2024, Professor Mark Graber published a post on Balkinization about the February 8, 2024 oral argument in Trump v. [read post]
11 May 2016, 4:03 am
Belmora's FLANAXBased on its reading of the Supreme Court’s Lexmark decision, the lower court had dismissed Bayer’s Section 43(a) false association and false advertising claims under FRCP 12(b)(6) and entered judgment on the pleadings as to Bayer’s Section 14(3) claim, ruling that the Lanham Act does not allow an owner of a foreign mark not registered in the United States, who does not use the mark in the United States… [read post]
19 Oct 2022, 12:06 pm by Florian Mueller
Due to the unforeseen unavailability of a panel member, the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit had to postpone the Epic Games v. [read post]
2 Apr 2010, 9:44 am
My last blog post dealt with a new United States Supreme Court decision (Paidlla v. [read post]
3 Feb 2024, 9:52 am by Marty Lederman
 I’ve marked in boldface, and labeled as [1] and [2], the two separate clauses of Section 3 that identify particular officers and other government officials. [read post]
31 Jan 2017, 2:43 pm by Nikki Siesel
The United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit had to determine if JobDiva Inc. [read post]
31 Jan 2017, 2:43 pm by Nikki Siesel
The United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit had to determine if JobDiva Inc. [read post]
11 Oct 2010, 11:00 am
 Currently, any individual may bring a claim on behalf of the United States for false patent marking. [read post]