Search for: "Marks v. Howe"
Results 501 - 520
of 14,208
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Apr 2013, 12:37 pm
Pressed by Marty to explain how ICANN can distinguish between good applicants and bad ones, Mary pointed out that all applicants were examined -- the problem of choice runs between competing good applicants as well as good v bad ones -- and expressed the hope that competing applicants would reach a negotiated understanding. [read post]
6 Feb 2015, 6:31 am
Arnold J speculates that these facts might include how much of Actavis's product is in fact prescribed for the patented use, which will of course be jolly interesting.The beginning of the judgment notes two developments that are totally opposite in their import. [read post]
18 Oct 2021, 2:13 am
Comment The judgment shows that reputed trade marks will not always be spared from revocation, and that in the assessment of trade mark use, it matters how customers view the products. [read post]
14 Apr 2021, 8:21 am
So, represented by a lawyer (Mark Javitch), she sued Twitter for violating her civil rights. [read post]
19 Nov 2007, 7:30 am
Anytime Fitness, Inc. v. [read post]
4 Sep 2023, 9:02 am
It is decisive how the relevant public perceives the sign if it were used as a trade mark for the goods or services claimed. [read post]
24 Oct 2019, 9:19 am
Revokey McRevokeface for McDonalds McMark Supermac's v McDonald's Cancellation no. 14787C, EUIPO (July 2019) I covered an earlier chapter of this burger battle in Volume V, in which poor evidence led to the loss of a BIG MAC EU trade mark registration. [read post]
16 May 2011, 3:35 am
How is that right decision to become law? [read post]
30 Apr 2021, 4:30 am
The relationship between the applicant’s mark and the subject matter or purpose of the goods and services in question were therefore sufficiently direct to render the word mark descriptive of those goods and services, in spite of the fact that the relevant public did not know how the meditation was practised or what the method used exactly consisted of. [read post]
21 Nov 2007, 7:26 am
V. [read post]
14 Sep 2011, 2:13 am
QS Holdings Sarl v Paul’s Retail Pty Ltd (No 2) [2011] FCA 1038 [read post]
10 Jan 2012, 3:30 pm
Brigadier General Mark Martins is, at this hour, giving the following address to the New York City Bar Association: Remarks of Brigadier General Mark Martins Chief Prosecutor, Military Commissions To the New York City Bar Association Tuesday, January 10, 2011 “Legitimacy and Comparative Law in Reformed Military Commissions” Good evening, and thank you, Jim, for that generous introduction and for the warm hospitality you have shown Kate and me and our… [read post]
22 Mar 2021, 5:16 am
In Priceless Travel, Inc. v Wender Law Group, PLLC 2021 NY Slip Op 30572(U) February 26, 2021 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: 151867/2020, Judge Margaret A. [read post]
22 Oct 2018, 9:26 am
Worried about how Sveen v. [read post]
10 Apr 2017, 8:18 am
One observer noted that it was difficult to see how Courts of different member states would follow this (controversial) relief when Courts from different me [read post]
30 Dec 2014, 9:40 am
In particular, when if at all should trade mark infringers be sent to prison and, if they should, how should the duration of their sentences be calculated? [read post]
19 Feb 2013, 11:00 pm
(see Buck v. [read post]
17 Sep 2018, 2:00 am
Harris (D-California) surrounding the 2015 Obergefell v. [read post]
17 Sep 2018, 2:00 am
Harris (D-California) surrounding the 2015 Obergefell v. [read post]
27 Jul 2020, 3:33 pm
Inc., v. [read post]
