Search for: "Marshall v. New York"
Results 501 - 520
of 1,178
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Oct 2011, 9:50 am
Nothing in New York City constitutes a "sidewalk" for purposes of bicycle riding in New York City (if, that is, the rider proceeds slowly and cautiously and does not swear at pedestrians who obstruct his [her] path). [read post]
17 Jun 2014, 5:54 pm
FDA Internet and Social Media Guidances Issued Today – Ginny Boland of McGuireWoods on the firm’s blog, FDA Life Air Marshal Whistleblower v. [read post]
5 Apr 2010, 3:45 am
And that is based on the recent legal battle over New York's 2007 amendments to our attorney ethics rules in Alexander v Cahill. [read post]
23 Nov 2014, 12:30 am
"A Chosen Exile: A History of Racial Passing in American Life by Allyson Hobbs (Harvard University Press) reviewed in The New York Times. [read post]
3 Aug 2021, 2:22 pm
York & York v. [read post]
31 Mar 2009, 3:16 pm
In Irma Johnson v. [read post]
20 Aug 2010, 11:48 am
Howe Chemical Co., Inc., 210 AD2d 62 [1st Dept 1994]; see also Matter of Freeman, 34 NY2d 1, 9 [1974]; Marshall v New York City Health & Hosps. [read post]
19 Feb 2016, 3:03 pm
The New York Telephone Case: The Second Circuit’s Decision In United States v. [read post]
9 Jan 2019, 1:54 pm
Waxman replies that the principle of state sovereign immunity “is no different than Chief Justice Marshall’s recognition in McCulloch versus Maryland of the constitutional principle of intergovernmental immunity, [or] of the principle against commandeering that’s recognized by the court in Printz and New York versus United States. [read post]
12 Jan 2011, 3:51 am
” In fact, when the Court overruled New York v. [read post]
14 Apr 2018, 1:01 am
Thurgood Marshall, the lead attorney, used the arguments developed for Mendez v. [read post]
16 Apr 2019, 4:30 am
Public Service Commission of New York applied, the provision could not withstand either level of review because it was not narrowly tailored to serve a substantial government interest. [read post]
6 Jan 2011, 12:16 pm
In a 2010 letter to the science commission, Wood said Willingham investigators could not be considered negligent because their arson conclusions were based on investigative standards common to that era.The Innocence Project of New York emailed out these documents related to the case: Report on the Peer Review of the Expert Testimony in the Cases of State of Texas v. [read post]
23 Oct 2018, 6:00 am
I shall note below the implications of this third notion of “fixing” the Constitution, which is in fatal tension with the far more dynamic view of American constitutionalism enunciated by John Marshall in what remains the single most important opinion in our history, McCulloch v. [read post]
10 May 2010, 4:51 am
And, of course, even that rule doesn't apply when the "public safety exception" of New York v. [read post]
20 Apr 2017, 9:01 pm
Properly and narrowly understood, the decision of sanctuary jurisdictions to decline to lend certain kinds of enforcement assistance to federal immigration authorities might, as I wrote in a previous column, very well be protected by the so-called anti-commandeering principle reflected in New York v. [read post]
17 Apr 2008, 11:29 am
Linda Greenhouse writes, "Justices Uphold Lethal Injection in Kentucky Case," in the New York Times.The legal question was what standard to apply in evaluating the risk. [read post]
26 Dec 2013, 4:39 am
In her column for The New York Times, Linda Greenhouse considers what Chief Justice Warren Burger and Justice Thurgood Marshall might have thought of the new exhibit on the Constitution at the National Archives. [read post]
23 Sep 2022, 4:00 am
Spending in election cycles by corporations and the ultrawealthy through so-called dark money groups has skyrocketed since the 2010 Supreme Court decision Citizens United v. [read post]
24 Feb 2020, 4:05 am
Briefly: For The New York Times, Timothy Williams reports that a pending ruling in Ramos v. [read post]
