Search for: "Matter of Booker"
Results 501 - 520
of 557
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Sep 2015, 5:24 am
In Bartlett, the defendant “was unable to change [the product’s] composition as a matter of both federal law and basic chemistry. [read post]
20 Aug 2008, 10:31 pm
The district court granted the Defendants' motion to stay the suit and ordered the matter to arbitration. [read post]
6 May 2022, 9:14 am
Cory Booker of New Jersey and Rep. [read post]
8 Mar 2013, 12:00 am
It’s been eighteen months since Christopher Booker exposed the reality of the family justice system, citing it as “callous, corrupt and staggeringly expensive”. [read post]
1 Mar 2018, 7:06 am
Court of Appeals for the 10th Circuit concluded that the officers were entitled to qualified immunity on the grounds that the case involved “a unique set of facts and circumstances” and Sause hadn’t “identified a single case in which this court, or any other court for that matter, has found a First Amendment violation based on a factual scenario even remotely resembling [it]. [read post]
17 Jun 2009, 9:32 am
The more out-of-range sentences that judges impose after Booker, the more disparity there will be. [read post]
13 Apr 2023, 6:05 am
Senators Dick Durbin (D-IL) and Cory Booker (D-NJ) similarly noted in a public letter last month that, “Direct state support for M23 enables its reign of terror across the Eastern DRC. [read post]
31 Dec 2014, 5:00 am
Booker v. [read post]
4 Sep 2007, 2:47 am
Booker. [read post]
9 May 2018, 9:40 am
Booker when the Sentencing Guidelines were still mandatory. [read post]
6 Jun 2020, 12:43 pm
The NJ Supreme Court decided an asbestos product liability case that mandates strict liability against manufacturers or distributors of products that contain asbestos-fiber. [read post]
20 May 2019, 6:30 am
Du Bois and not Booker T. [read post]
15 Jan 2008, 1:50 pm
Sexton, No. 05-6412, 05-6415, 05-6416 Defendants' sentences for offenses stemming from the distribution of cocaine, imposed on a remand pursuant to Booker, are affirmed over meritless claims that: 1) the district court violated their Sixth Amendment and due process rights by using its own factual findings to calculate their sentencing ranges under the Guidelines; 2) the sentences exceeded the "maximum statutory sentence" allowable for their offenses; 3) imposition of their… [read post]
4 Dec 2013, 3:42 pm
That judgment, annotated by the judge this week, is to be found here : In the matter of AA 23 August 2012. [read post]
17 Nov 2008, 6:39 pm
(Substituted opinion) U.S. 9th Circuit Court of Appeals, November 13, 2008 In re: Gallaher, No. 07-74593 In a criminal appeal arising from a district court's refusal to accept a conditional guilty plea, a petition for writ of mandamus challenging the refusal is denied but the matter is remanded for reassignment to a new judge to reconsider the conditional plea where: 1) under Fed. [read post]
1 Oct 2007, 4:45 am
Robinson, No. 06-5787A sentence for various drug and firearms offenses is affirmed as: 1) a previous remand of the case was a limited remand, not a general remand, and the district court properly followed the circuit court's directives; 2) although review of Booker claims was not foreclosed by the limited remand, the sentence was neither procedurally nor substantively unreasonable and the 18 U.S.C. section 3553(a) factors were properly applied; and 3) there was no abuse of discretion… [read post]
14 Mar 2017, 5:07 pm
Bad behaviour, including marital infidelity is rarely relevant to the legal arguments about financial matters. [read post]
5 Nov 2014, 2:00 pm
Cory Booker, D-N.J.; Susan Collins, R-Maine; Lindsey Graham, R-S.C.; Jeff Merkley, D-Ore.; and Tom Udall, D-N.M. [read post]
14 Dec 2007, 7:22 pm
Because complete diversity is lacking in this case, we reverse the judgment of the district court and remand the case for consideration of the need to dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. 07a0478p.06 Morgan v. [read post]
3 Dec 2019, 8:57 am
Booker, appellate review of federal sentences is for “reasonableness,” to be evaluated under the factors legislatively specified in Section 3553(a). [read post]
