Search for: "Matter of Kerr v Kerr"
Results 501 - 520
of 883
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Dec 2013, 2:55 am
A. v Secretary of State for the Home Department. [read post]
5 Dec 2013, 2:55 am
A. v Secretary of State for the Home Department. [read post]
4 Dec 2013, 9:08 pm
(Orin Kerr) This is a follow-up to this morning’s post on United States v. [read post]
4 Dec 2013, 10:11 am
(Orin Kerr) Yesterday the Fourth Circuit handed down an interesting Fourth Amendment decision in United States v. [read post]
3 Dec 2013, 12:26 pm
(Orin Kerr) Reading EFF’s amicus brief recently filed in United States v. [read post]
3 Dec 2013, 10:52 am
But I think the majority is clearly right as a legal matter (which is the matter that matters, at least to me). [read post]
7 Nov 2013, 2:51 pm
(Orin Kerr) UC Hastings professor Rory Little has written a response to my post on Fernandez v. [read post]
7 Nov 2013, 12:31 am
(Orin Kerr) A lot of folks in the blogosphere have been writing about this story on Eckert v. [read post]
3 Nov 2013, 8:05 pm
Gawker and Sheldon v. [read post]
2 Nov 2013, 4:28 am
Regarding Aamer v. [read post]
28 Oct 2013, 2:53 am
Listed this morning for half a day in Courtroom 2 is the appeal of Zoumbas v Secretary of State for the Home Department, to be heard by L Hale, L Kerr, L Reed, L Toulson and L Hodge. [read post]
24 Oct 2013, 9:27 am
(Orin Kerr) The forthcoming Supreme Court issue of the Harvard Law Review will feature an essay by NYU Law professor Erin Murphy on the Supreme Court’s recent Fourth Amendment case on DNA searches, Maryland v. [read post]
7 Oct 2013, 12:05 am
From Wednesday 9 until Thursday 10 October 2013 is the appeal of Bull & Anor v Hall & Anor, in front of L Neuberger, L Hale, L Kerr, L Hughes and L Toulson. [read post]
17 Sep 2013, 6:03 pm
The Fourth Amendment does not bar the government’s proposed collection of telephony metadata, she writes, because the production “is squarely controlled by” Smith v. [read post]
3 Sep 2013, 7:41 pm
(Orin Kerr) In Florida v. [read post]
25 Aug 2013, 5:55 pm
For my previous post and links to earlier posts by Sherry, myself and Orin Kerr, see here). [read post]
22 Aug 2013, 2:37 pm
But, as I discussed in my earlier critique, the same would be true of cases like Lochner and Hammer v. [read post]
18 Aug 2013, 3:37 pm
We saw this both in Chief Justice Roberts’s opinion, and that of the dissenters, in NFIB v. [read post]
14 Aug 2013, 12:49 pm
(Orin Kerr) In Davis v. [read post]
13 Aug 2013, 2:51 am
The post Case Comment:Torfaen County Borough Council v Douglas Willis Ltd [2013] UKSC 59 appeared first on UKSC blog. [read post]
