Search for: "Matter of Morrison" Results 501 - 520 of 1,430
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Apr 2017, 8:49 am by Ad Law Defense
  The targeted defendants include manufacturers of Pacqui Corn Chips (Dominique Morrison v. [read post]
22 Mar 2017, 6:30 am by Helen Klein Murillo
The statute makes it a crime to “willfully and contrary to [an] oath state[] or subscribe[] any material matter which he does not believe to be true. [read post]
15 Mar 2017, 4:28 pm by Josh Blackman
Bruce Morrison (D-CT) introduced a legislative response, that would become known as the Lautenberg Amendment. [read post]
13 Mar 2017, 2:39 pm
Citing  Morrison, it stated that `[i]f domestic contacts presented by the case fall within the “focus” of the statutory provision. . . , then the application of the provision is not unlawfully extraterritorial. [read post]
1 Mar 2017, 9:30 am by Legal Beagle
Summary of conclusions reached 5‑year prescription:  awareness of loss, sections 11(3) and 6(4) [5]        While it is possible that losses which were easily identifiable by HC may have occurred in 2007, leading to the triggering of the 5‑year prescription in 2007 (i.e. more than five years before the actions were raised in 2014:  see paragraphs [58] to [61] below), this is a matter of dispute which cannot be resolved on the… [read post]
26 Jan 2017, 7:11 pm by Blair & Kim, PLLC
Matters related to children are often the most contentious aspects of a divorce. [read post]
26 Jan 2017, 7:11 pm by Blair & Kim, PLLC
Matters related to children are often the most contentious aspects of a divorce. [read post]
23 Jan 2017, 7:59 am by Rebecca Tushnet
”  “Julie Morrison, a consulting engineer in Illinois, testified that she had been open to the possibility of recommending Fusible PVC for a project in Illinois but had changed her mind after finding and reading Palermo’s presentation online. [read post]
6 Jan 2017, 2:13 pm by Richard Huttner
But Weir points to his office’s unsuccessful efforts to incarcerate Peter Cain, 48, of Morrison, convicted of a felony DUI after a trial this year, as to why he thinks changes are needed. [read post]
4 Jan 2017, 1:06 pm by John Delaney and Aaron Rubin
Couple that with the fact that President-elect Trump’s appointments to fill the Commission’s two vacancies will almost surely not be aggressive enforcers, and we will see less enforcement from the FTC—not just with respect to privacy and data security matters, but with respect to consumer protection issues more generally. [read post]
12 Dec 2016, 6:12 am by Randy Barnett
My own list is Bakke (for rejecting all the rationales for affirmative action that really matter), Buckley v. [read post]
9 Dec 2016, 1:00 pm
The case involves a claim of invalidity of Fontem’s Patent EP2022349 related to an electronic cigarette as well as for a declaration of non-infringement and a counterclaim for infringement.BREAKING: Antidote found for poisonous prioritiesDavid Brophy blogs about the order in case G 1/15 of the Enlarged Board of Appeal at the EPO, which establishes that partial priority of a claim comprising alternative subject-matter may not be refused based on one or more generic expressions or… [read post]
1 Dec 2016, 6:30 am by SHG
That being the case, it was only a matter of time before the NY Times hopped aboard the hypocrite express. [read post]
29 Nov 2016, 10:40 am by Zosha Millman
Litigation & Trial from Max Kennerly makes it back on the list this year, thanks to his always ability to blog passionately no matter what the issue. [read post]
17 Nov 2016, 1:44 am by Constanty Okolie
Implication The Court of Appeal had commented in respect of the HMT’s liability post-refinancing that “the probability is that no consideration was given to the matter at all“. [read post]
16 Nov 2016, 4:36 pm by Kevin LaCroix
”  Whether or not Morrison’s second prong is satisfied and the U.S. securities laws apply to transactions in Samarco’s debt securities will depend on the circumstances surrounding the transactions. [read post]
2 Nov 2016, 4:37 pm by Kevin LaCroix
”  The ECJ also noted that the concept of “‘matters relating to tort, delict or quasi-delict’” under current Article 7(2) “do[es] not concern ‘matters relating to a contract’ within the meaning of [current Article 7(1)(a)]. [read post]