Search for: "Matter of Murphy v Murphy" Results 501 - 520 of 935
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Jul 2012, 5:46 am by Rosalind English
The important question raised by this apparently silly litigation is therefore whether the time has come to rethink the shibboleth that states have a wide discretion to restrict forms of expression which offend religious beliefs (Murphy v. [read post]
7 Feb 2012, 2:31 pm
 The IPKat, whose cousin Purrcival made his Premier League debut at Anfield last night in the Liverpool v Spurs fixture, thinks that it's very sad when disputes of this nature, would like to see these matters sorted out by realistic and affordable licensing policies on the part of the rights owners, matched by a willingness to pay realistic and affordable licence fees on the part of the publicans. [read post]
2 Dec 2013, 4:08 am by Peter Mahler
 Here’s the pertinent excerpt from the ruling: When a corporation elects to buy out a minority shareholder at fair value, the issue is what a willing purchaser in an arm’s length transaction would offer for the shareholder’s interest in the company as an operating business (Murphy v. [read post]
20 May 2020, 10:59 am by Andrew Appel
  That order was issued in the Clinic’s case Gusciora v. [read post]
4 Feb 2021, 7:59 am by Kevin Kaufman
The growth is a result of more states legalizing sports betting since the Supreme Court’s 2018 decision in Murphy v. [read post]
22 Jul 2008, 2:39 am
  The DLSE was forced to beat a hasty retreat, however, when the California Supreme Court issued its decision in Murphy v. [read post]
8 Jun 2017, 4:04 pm by INFORRM
  Pundits understand this will be the first civil jury trial to be set down in Invercargill since Murphy v Kelly in 1919 (settled on the eve of trial, but which, as a sign of different times, would have been the eleventh libel jury trial in Invercargill since 1882). [read post]
14 Jul 2011, 4:51 pm by Gordon Firemark
Sony Pictures http://www.scribd.com/doc/58902438/Cabell-v-SONY-Pictures THREsq: http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/appeals-court-backs-adam-sandler-205956 Shock Jocks’ Photo Credit Edit Breached DMCA: 3rd Circ Murphy v. [read post]