Search for: "Matter of Singh v Singh" Results 501 - 517 of 517
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 May 2008, 8:30 am
Tomorrow, (May 19) an interesting SLP is coming up as a fresh matter before the Vacation Bench of Justice C.K.Thakker and Lokeshwar Singh Panta in the matter of Union of India v. [read post]
12 May 2008, 12:51 pm
Because the record shows that such an increase in commuting time is de minimis as a matter of law, we AFFIRM the district court's judgment that none of the plaintiffs' commuting time is compensable under the FLSA....In the commuting context, we believe that the appropriate application of the predominant benefit test is whether an employer's restrictions hinder the employees' ability to use their commuting time as they otherwise would have had there been no work-related… [read post]
5 Dec 2007, 12:24 am
Singh Subscription Required KINGS COUNTYCivil Practice Plaintiff Can Amend Claim; Addition Does Not Alter Liability Theory Holmes-Thompson v. [read post]
9 Oct 2007, 1:19 am
COURT OF APPEALS, SECOND CIRCUITCriminal Practice Failure to Appoint Indigent Counsel at Evidence Hearing Breached Rule 8(c) as to §2254 Petitions, Was Error NEW YORK COUNTYCriminal Practice Decision Denying Inmate Right to Call Witnesses At CCH Due Process Hearing Annulled as Arbitrary Matter of Singh v. [read post]
17 Sep 2007, 12:51 am
The link to my article is here.The Supreme Court has said as early as 1964, in Kharak Singh and others v. [read post]
8 Sep 2007, 2:52 am
The Court did not seem to take note of the devolution of constitutional responsibilities and stuck to the age old line taken in Kartar Singh v. [read post]
28 Aug 2007, 8:58 am
Singh literally questioned the court's role in monitoring the "forest matter" for nearly a decade. [read post]
18 Jul 2007, 6:28 pm
If you can obtain legal permanent residence through a valid application, you may ask the BIA to remand the case back to the immigration judge to give you a chance to get legal permanent residence instead of pursuing the appeal.In Singh v. [read post]
30 Jun 2007, 12:07 am
In the light of certain doubts expressed by Mr.Arun Thiruvengadam in the comments section to my previous post, whether it would be wise to restrict the Opposition and the press' campaign against Ms.Patil, especially as the campaign has brought out the allegations against her in all details (I would say they are still unsubstantiated and unverified, because the Congress has denied them by making contrary claims; it is not correct to say that the Congress has not denied these at all), I am giving… [read post]
10 May 2007, 9:49 pm
The Supreme Court had an opportunity to examine this issue in Narayan Singh v. [read post]