Search for: "Mayer v. Mayer"
Results 501 - 520
of 983
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Jun 2020, 10:34 am
Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer, Inc., 134 S.Ct. 1962 (2014). [read post]
26 Sep 2007, 3:54 am
Inc. v. [read post]
17 Aug 2023, 3:30 am
The latest crypto decision, also from the SDNY — SEC v. [read post]
16 Dec 2015, 4:00 am
Commentary on Monday’s opinion in DIRECTV v. [read post]
12 Oct 2008, 9:51 pm
Cohesive Tech v. [read post]
8 May 2018, 10:16 am
Ferguson and Hodges v. [read post]
30 Jun 2011, 12:51 pm
NMT 4 (U.S.A. v. [read post]
19 May 2016, 4:06 am
Commentary on Monday’s decision in Spokeo v. [read post]
26 Jun 2014, 3:56 am
Aereo and Riley v. [read post]
8 Dec 2014, 3:38 am
In DDR Holdings v. [read post]
17 Jun 2015, 1:48 pm
This lawsuit was Galper v. [read post]
6 Nov 2013, 4:00 am
For this last week: Pro Sys Consultants Ltd. v. [read post]
3 Jun 2016, 10:02 am
To me, Petrella v. [read post]
28 Jan 2012, 6:45 am
A classic intrusion on seclusion case, Hamberger v. [read post]
29 Apr 2014, 10:58 am
Herbst v. [read post]
5 Nov 2013, 4:56 am
At Mayer Brown’s Class Defense blog, Archis Parasharami discusses yesterday’s denial of certiorari in Marek v. [read post]
11 Mar 2015, 9:10 pm
See Graham v. [read post]
5 Jun 2017, 10:15 am
., Inc. v. [read post]
16 Jun 2014, 7:33 am
A highlight was the “JZ v. [read post]
4 Nov 2008, 10:07 am
After that hearing, at which scientific literature was introduced and doctors for both the planitiffs and defendants testified, Justice Mayer ruled that plaintiffs would not be allowed to offer expert testimony at trial in support of their MCS claims:In New York, evidence based on novel scientific theories or techniques is considered admissible only upon a showing of general acceptance within the relevant scientific community (People v Carrieri, 49 AD3d 660, 854 NYS2d 427 [2d Dept… [read post]
