Search for: "Mays v. City of LA"
Results 501 - 520
of 1,046
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Dec 2015, 9:00 am
Recently, we had a pretty spooky case come down, Schmidt v. [read post]
22 Dec 2015, 5:10 am
For her decision see: Toronto (City) v Toronto Professional Fire Fighters’ Association, Local 3888, 2014 CanLII 76886 (ON LA). [read post]
18 Dec 2015, 9:30 pm
In the LA Times, John Inazu (Washington University, St. [read post]
17 Dec 2015, 10:16 am
La. [read post]
14 Dec 2015, 5:36 am
’ City ofChicago v. [read post]
8 Nov 2015, 3:33 pm
Samuels v Birmingham City Council [ 2015 ] EWCA Civ 1051 A second appeal from a s.204 County Court appeal that addressed the council’s decision-making on whether the property from which Ms Samuels had become homeless was affordable (and thus, whether she was intentionally homeless for failing to pay the full rent). [read post]
3 Nov 2015, 5:04 pm
B256605); The City of Beverly Hills v. [read post]
29 Oct 2015, 10:37 pm
Amistad Christiana Church v Life is Beautiful, LLC, 2015 WL 5532299 (D. [read post]
16 Oct 2015, 11:24 pm
Bassel’s engagement in favor of a free Internet may have brought him to jail, but the attention that we, citizens on the Internet, give to this case may, to some degree, help bring him out of the darkness. [read post]
8 Oct 2015, 5:00 am
Bloxom, 512 So.2d 839, 850 (La. 1987); Payne v. [read post]
30 Sep 2015, 8:10 am
MLB and Laumann v. [read post]
28 Sep 2015, 9:01 pm
According to the appellate court in Schiavo, Atlantic City was “changed forever” in 2003 by the opening of the Borgata, a “Las Vegas-style resort. [read post]
28 Sep 2015, 6:00 am
(and other) demands for its production, and also to enact laws requiring certain data to be held locally, creating a form of reciprocal pressure.[5] In this environment, the same action in response to a surveillance directive may be at once both legally required by one government’s laws, and legally forbidden by another’s. [read post]
24 Aug 2015, 8:00 am
La Fetra is a Principal Attorney at Pacific Legal Foundation. [read post]
8 Aug 2015, 5:08 pm
Following R (Jakimaviciute) v Hammersmith and Fulham LBC [2014] EWCA Civ 1438 [our report] and Alemi, R (on the application of) v Westminster City Council [2015] EWHC 1765 (Admin) [our report], it was not permissible to set qualifying [read post]
19 Jul 2015, 2:43 pm
They rejected TWU submission, based on the recent SCC decision in Mouvement laïque québécois v. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 9:17 am
. * Katz v. [read post]
27 Jun 2015, 2:50 pm
ATTORNEY-CLIENT ARBITRATIONA LA CARTE While the Supreme Court may have given a present to the legal profession by holding that such one-sided arbitration agreements are neither unconscionable nor against public policy -- which will no doubt be appreciated by Texas lawyers -- the ruling may also have opened up a can of worms, and may yet spur more appellate litigation over arbitration in the attorney-client context (and claim-splitting). [read post]
24 Jun 2015, 4:25 pm
Yet more examples were used to illustrate the point: Vestron v HBO on the futility of injunctions in some cases; Sony v Universal City Studios (the Betamax case) on the contention that disasters predicted by plaintiffs seldom turn out as bad as is first claimed - in that case the home theatre market proved to be a goldmine for the creative industry, not its nemesis. [read post]
22 Jun 2015, 3:13 pm
See below to access the full Supreme Court opinion in City of Los Angeles v. [read post]
